New York Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer took the opportunity to blast President Trump for revoking security clearances or threatening to revoke them, equating him to a dictator.
It took conservative actor James Woods all of one tweet to explain to him that the comparison is ridiculous, which, as we’ve reported several times here, is not unusual. Anyone who follows Woods on Twitter knows that he not only has a singular wit, he has an uncanny ability to knock liberal talking points out of the ball park without even breaking a sweat.
From the Senate floor, Schumer declared: “The abuse of the powers of public office to silence critics, punish political enemies is exactly what goes on in dictatorships in banana republics.”
The senator was addressing the situation with former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) director John Brennan being stripped of his security clearance by the President.
Woods offered his take on such a claim, reminding Schumer of what really happens in a dictatorship.
No, Senator. What goes on in dictatorships is that people like you insult leaders and end up in lime pits. In a Republic like ours, you can yap away, as you are wont to do, and get to ride in private jets. So stop the hyperbole. https://t.co/d91u8wIwPi
— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) August 20, 2018
Senator Rand Paul originally demanded Brennan have his security clearance revoked because he allegedly had been profiting off of it, divulging secrets in his role as an analyst in the media. President Trump finally agreed to do so last week.
Schumer didn’t quite see it as a means to clean up the mess created by Obama-era officials, instead referring to it as a “gratuitous act of political retribution taken out of spite and malice.”
“It was an attempt to silence critics of the president, something the president regularly tries to do usually unsuccessfully,” he said.
A dictator would revoke Schumer's clearance, not some previous employee that no longer needs it.
— Gary Brown (@GaryBrown74) August 21, 2018
Schumer keeps using that word ‘dictator,’ but I don’t think he knows what it means. Perhaps someone should send him a dictionary.
Meanwhile, the President continues to clean house, threatening to remove other corrupt officials security clearances, including Bruce Ohr and James Clapper.
He also went after former Intelligence Official Phillip Mudd, following his unhinged rant in which the now-CNN panelist berated a black Trump supporter and ordered him off the set when he dared to confront him with facts.
Trump did, however, deny a report that he had considered revoking Barack Obama’s access to intelligence briefings.
Fake News, of which there is soooo much (this time the very tired New Yorker) falsely reported that I was going to take the extraordinary step of denying Intelligence Briefings to President Obama. Never discussed or thought of!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 21, 2018
The Political Insider is currently running a poll asking if you believe Obama’s security clearance should be revoked. What do you think?
Cross-posted with Mental Recession
- Say what? John Brennan calls revoked security clearance an attack on free speech
- Trump Considers Revoking Security Clearances of Brennan, Clapper, Rice, Hayden, Comey, McCabe
- ‘Operational mind of an earthworm’: Former CIA officer says Brennan’s ‘day of judgment is coming’
- Former US Attorney: Brennan Led Group Trying to Frame Donald Trump
- Brennan freaks out, demands GOP leadership stop Trump from ordering investigation into FBI/DOJ
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so. You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line and be sure to check out our MeWe page here and our new PatrioticSpace group here.
And while you’re at it, be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative front-page founded by ex-military!