WA Grassroots organizing to battle billionaire-backed gun control

In the few days since the Washington State Supreme Court ruled unanimously to allow anti-gun Initiative 1639 on the November ballot, grassroots activists have literally swung into action, setting up social media pages, raising money to fight the measure and organizing.

 

Grassroots activists are fired up to oppose Initiative 1639 in Washington State, which has become the gun rights battleground for 2018.

Their “gathering hub” is a Facebook page called Washington2A, and there’s a message that is being shared across social media:

take our poll - story continues below

Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • Should Brett Kavanaugh withdraw over sexual misconduct allegations?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Conservative Firing Line updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Right on time: Smear against Kavanaugh continues with questionable account from second accuser

“Stop crying about a few billionaires donating $4 million (total) to pass I-1639.
With 500,000 active Concealed Pistol License holders in Washington State, CPL holders alone could vastly out donate the billionaires. $20 from each CPL holder would put $10,000,000 into the fight. $25 (the fee 1639 would require) from each gun owner would generate over $51,000,000 to protect our Civil Right to Keep and Bear Arms.”

This movement does not appear to be connected to the Save Our Security campaign, which is already raising money – albeit less than $20,000 so far – to wage a campaign against the gun control measure. But taken as a whole, the state high court’s decision to allow what critics believe is a legally-flawed initiative on the ballot, after it was ordered disqualified by a Thurston County Superior Court judge has infuriated and energized the Evergreen State firearms community.

Screen snip of the language that removes information about state preemption from a Department of Fish & Wildlife pamphlet on gun safety.

Some are particularly upset that buried in the 30 pages of legislation is a provision to remove notification about the state’s 35-year-old preemption statute from the pages of a gun safety pamphlet published by the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Why would initiative backers want that language stricken, other than to keep state residents in the dark about preemption?

————————————————–

UPDATE:  The National Rifle Association on Tuesday launched a website for grassroots activists opposed to I-1639. This makes at least two websites and at least one Facebook page devoted to organizing the statewide opposition.

————————————————–

Others are furious after finally realizing that, according to critics, I-1639 would classify .22-caliber semi-auto rifles such as the Browning SA-22 (a rifle that’s been around for more than a century), the Ruger 10/22, Marlin Model 60 and Winchester Model 74 as “semiautomatic assault rifles.” Here’s how I-1639 defines an “assault rifle” on Page 27:

“Semiautomatic assault rifle” means any rifle which utilizes a portion of the energy of a firing cartridge to extract the fired cartridge case and chamber the next round, and which requires a separate pull of the trigger to fire each cartridge. “Semiautomatic assault rifle” does not include antique firearms, any firearm that has been made permanently inoperable, or any firearm that is manually operated by bolt, pump, lever, or slide action.”–Initiative 1639

While gun owners support competent firearms safety instruction, they are not keen on government-mandated training, nor do they think annual background checks on rifle owners will do anything to prevent crime, as initiative backers have intimated. But those annual checks are in the measure, on Page 23, Section 15.

So, too, are a ten-day waiting period and so-called “secure storage” requirement.

Additionally, opponents believe the $25 fee dealers can charge amounts to a poll tax to exercise a constitutional right, and many contend that the initiative violates the single-subject rule.

At this point, the Evergreen State has become the gun rights battleground in the country. Neighboring Oregon saw an attempted gun ban initiative fall short of its signature goal, so now the country is watching to see whether Washington gun owners will rise to the challenge (with support from gun owners in other states who want to stop this now), or roll over and play dead.

———————————-

If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so. You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line and be sure to check out our MeWe page here and our new PatrioticSpace group here.
If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon.
And while you’re at it, be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative front-page founded by ex-military!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.