THAT being laid bare, Trudeau and his Canadian ilk share both an ideological bond and a dual-based common denominator with their northern Dem-socialist neighbors – in terms of their affinity for all things red-green at play. Trudeau’s outright support for ANTIFA (the red-based side of domestic terror), akin to the thumbs-up from his American counterparts, must be deemed prime, corresponding exhibits. Yes, to be silent IS to agree, too.
That’s why Justin Trudeau’s refusal to speak out against the Antifa violence in Quebec City is huge failure of leadership on his part.
Any Prime Minister – particularly one with such a large social media following – could do a lot of good by being clear that there is zero tolerance for violence against the police and against members of the media.
After all, without law and order and without a free press, our society would cease to function.
This isn’t about taking a political position. If a far-right group had attacked police and journalists, it would be just as important for Trudeau to condemn them. In this case however, it’s simply a fact that it’s a far-left group that committed these acts of violence.
Refusing to condemn is tacit approval
Trudeau’s refusal to condemn the violent Antifa actions is a tacit approval of them. The longer Trudeau goes without condemning it, the more it seems he is okay with what happened – which is an unacceptable position for a Canadian “leader.”
INEXORABLY, not one candidate from the 2020 Presidential (Demster) field would condemn ANTIFA’s brownshirt-like terror tactics!
Despite the well-documented violence of the radical left Antifa group — the Department of Homeland Security classifies it as “domestic terrorist violence” – not one of the 23 Democrats running for president would condemn Antifa when repeatedly asked by CNSNews.com over the course of 12 business days.
The Trump administration did respond, within a day, condemning Antifa.
In emails and telephone calls to the press offices and campaigns of the 23 Democrats running and to the Trump campaign, CNSNews.com asked the candidates to answer two questions about Antifa based on background about the group reported by Politico.
On Sept. 1, 2017, Politico ran a story entitled, “FBI, Homeland Security warn of more ‘antifa’ attacks.”
Politico reported, “Federal authorities have been warning state and local officials since early 2016 that leftist extremists known as ‘antifa’ had become increasingly confrontational and dangerous, so much so that the Department of Homeland Security formally classified their activities as ‘domestic terrorist violence,’ according to interviews and confidential law enforcement documents obtained by POLITICO.”
Politico went on to quote a senior law enforcement official:
“‘It was in that period [as the Trump campaign emerged] that we really became aware of them,’ said one senior law enforcement official tracking domestic extremists in a state that has become a front line for clashes between the groups. ‘These antifa guys were showing up with weapons, shields and bike helmets and just beating the shit out of people. … They’re using Molotov cocktails, they’re starting fires, they’re throwing bombs and smashing windows.’”
CNSNews.com then asked the candidates, 1) Do you condemn Antifa? And 2) Do you believe federal law enforcement agencies should take all lawful steps necessary to prevent Antifa from engaging in ‘domestic terrorist violence’ during the 2020 U.S. election campaign?….continue reading about the dangerous, like-minded nexus here…..
INCONTESTABLY, ANTIFA mirrors its terrorist violence ala the brownshirts of pre-WWll, as evidenced in the severe beat-down given to Andy Ngo
…..Andy Ngo is an elfin, soft-spoken man. He also happens to be the gay son of Vietnamese immigrants—salient details, given Antifa’s absurd slogans about smashing the heteronormative white supremacist patriarchy. Like schoolboy characters out of Lord of the Flies, these cosplay revolutionaries stomp around, imagining themselves to be heroes stalking the great beast of fascism. But when the beast proves elusive, they gladly settle for beating up journalists, harassing the elderly or engaging in random physical destruction….
ALL of which circles back to the second common denominator between Trudeau’s comrades and his American like-minded crew; their allegiance to the empowerment of the green/Islamist (terror) side!
IN this regard, as per Trudeau’s history, well, there is no sense in re-working the wheel, so to speak. To wit, take a peek here: “Canada’s Unprotected Jihadi Frontier: A Clear & Present Danger.” Again, as to his American red-green terrorist enablers, they are more than similarly inclined: “The Transformation of America, The Puppeteers: The Red-Green Alliance.“
SO, how shocking is it that Trudeau, in his push towards Canada’s full-on deconstruction, reacts true to form, in so far as empowering, yes, empowering, the leadership of the Brotherhood Mafia’s main front-arms in the U.S. and Canada, namely, via ISNA and its terrorist offshoots?
The Trudeau government’s handling of the grants has been mired in controversy and mismanagement since they announced a values attestation, which initially required organizations to sign a pro-abortion pledge or be deemed ineligible for funding.
Because of the controversial pledge, several organizations with Christian values — including summer camps and soup kitchens — were denied funding last summer.
Once again this summer, the Trudeau government’s funding is raising eyebrows. The feds awarded the Islamic Society of North America-Canada (ISNA-Canada) with $25,787 in Canada Summer Jobs funding despite having its charity status revoked by the Canada Revenue Agency for allegedly funding a militant terror group.
According to official records, seven chapters of the Muslim Association of Canada (MAC) were listed as approved for funding.
The Trudeau government’s dedication to Islamic ideology is obvious and blatant. For this very reason establishment media will not expose the truth. Government and media working in collusion is a signal an element of communism has permeated society.
More and more it appears Justin Trudeau’s post-modern, no core identity Canada is in reality a post Anglo-Christian Canada. Since Trudeau took office, our nation has been trans-formed into a society controlled by government hypocrisy and favouritism.
Old Stock Canada, Anglophone Canada, Christian Canada: please take a seat at the back of the bus. Rosa Parks has yet to arrive. Third World Canada, you can assume the position formerly held by Old Stock Canada.
This is the globalist vision of Justin Trudeau. This is the practical outcome for hired-hand immigration minister, MP Ahmed Hussen. This is a dream of anti-Anglo Trudeau-appointed Senator Ratna Omidvar. A best possible outcome for dual citizen drop-ins MP Omar Alghabra, Iqra Khalid and Liberal speaker of the house, MP Bardish Chagger.
For the majority of Canadians, however, it is akin to a nightmare. Which Canadian is the number one driver of this TRANS-formative agenda? The son of the individual who created an entire legislative infrastructure to disempower and marginalize Anglophones in the first place—- Pierre Trudeau.
To add insult-to-injury, Pierre set things up so Old Stock Canada would FINANCE the decimation of their own culture and identity. In the meantime, the Multicultural Act of Canada(1988) stipulates that Third World Canada are to promote their culture, identity religion and language throughout Canadian society.
What happens when Anglo-Canada emulates the behaviour for themselves? We are RACISTS, bigots, and xenophobes. Caught in a moment and you can’t get out of it? Trudeau, Hussen, and the rest of the Liberal-Globalist destroyers certainly hope so.
MOST significantly, if, heaven forfend, any of the Dem-socialists win the Presidency (all of whom, to one degree or another, are beholden to the red-green axis), the likes of which is outlined above will be recorded and remembered as child’s play, that is, in comparison to what lies in wait.
F O R E W A R N E D! STAY ARMED!
- This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
- If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}