“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.”
Sun Tzu, Art of War – Between 475 and 221 B.C.E.
IT is not for nothing that this Islamic jihadi expert thanked Dr. Martin Sherman in the Acknowledgements of my book (co-authored with Joe Newby), BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad. In fact, the linked book review is equally telling of an obvious symbiosis and synergy.
ATOP all of said nexus, the respect within for his strategic and tactical acumen — most acutely, when it relates to Islamic jihadi terrorism, in general, and the hydra’s intentions towards Israel, in particular — dare not be wished away. So much so, many steeped within this off-the-charts genocidal cesspool couldn’t agree more. Take it to the bank. Read here, here, here, here, here, here, and so on and so forth.
AND not to mix apples and oranges, so to speak, while it is self-evident that Dr. Sherman has always been aces in this arena — by extrapolation, the Jewish Homeland wouldn’t be in existential peril had the top-tier political-security poohbahs heeded his on-target advice — it is also worth nothing that another politico, MK Avigdor Lieberman, got it right too.
THE difference is that at this end he has been considered persona non-grata (right now, a mea culpa is in order!) due to his animus towards the religious sector, as well as his (deserved) reputation of using strong-arm tactics to keep his Russian constituents in line.
NOW, there is no doubt that being raised under the boot of Soviet rule lends the “Russian strong-man” an advantage. Indeed, he is head and shoulders above the rest of “The Oslo Syndrome: Delusions Under Siege” (by Dr. Kenneth Levin) a/k/a Stockholm Syndrome-gripped losers at the political-security helm! Alas, view Lieberman’s prescience here and his current advice to the so-called War Cabinet here. Case closed. Again, mea culpa too.
ONTO the most incisive and prescient of all, that is, alongside Caroline Glick!
♦ ♦ ♦ ♦ ♦
ISRAEL NATIONAL NEWS | By Dr. Martin Sherman | October 29, 2023
One of the reasons that the conflict with the Palestinian-Arabs in general and Gazan Arabs in particular, has dragged on for years, is that Israel has failed to conceptualize the conflict correctly
There is a prevailing myth that the general population in Gaza is the hapless victim of its radical leadership. This is demonstrably false.
Crucible, not victim
Indeed, the population in Gaza is not the victim of its
Islamist leaders! On the contrary, it is the crucible in which that leadership was forged and from which it emerged.
Nothing can underscore the gruesome truth of that assertion more indelibly than this excerpt from a chilling telephone conversation between an elated Gazan terrorist and his enthralled parents—rejoicing over the slaughter of Israeli civilians.
TERRORIST: Hello Dad. Dad Open your WhatsApp right now and see…how many I killed with my own hands. Your son killed Jews.
FATHER: God is great God is great. May God protect you.
TERRORIST: [F]ather. I am talking to you from the phone of a Jew, I killed her and her husband, I killed ten with my own hands.
FATHER: God is great.
TERRORIST: I killed ten. Ten! Ten with my own bare hands. Their blood is on my hands, let me talk to Mom.
MOTHER: Oh, my son, may God protect you.
TERRORIST: I killed ten all by myself, mother.
MOTHER: I wish I was there with you.
This is the nature of the enemy. This is the human condition—or rather the inhuman condition with which Israel is compelled to contend.
Nothing as practical as good theory
This failure of Israeli society to grasp the true dimensions—the depth, and durability—of Arab rejection of Jewish sovereignty has long been reflected in both its domestic policy and in its foreign policy towards the nation’s Arab adversaries. Nowhere is this failing more glaring than in Israeli policy toward the Palestinian-Arabs in general, and toward the Arabs of Gaza in particular.
Accordingly, to devise effective policy to contend with abiding Arab enmity, Israel must correctly conceptualize the conflict over the issue of Jewish sovereignty in the Holy Land.
Archetypical zero-sum game
The unvarnished truth is that—correctly conceptualized—the conflict between the Jews and the Palestinian-Arabs over the control of the Holy Land is a clash between two rival collectives, with irreconcilable foundational narratives.
They are irreconcilable because the raison d’etre of the one is the preservation of Jewish political sovereignty in the Holy Land, while the raison d’etre of the other is the annulment of Jewish political sovereignty in the Holy Land—thus generating irreconcilable visions of homeland.
As such, the conflict between the Jews and the Palestinian-Arabs is an archetypical zero-sum game, in which the side’s gains inevitably imply the other side’s loss
As such it is a clash involving protagonists with antithetical and mutually exclusive core objectives. Only one can emerge victorious; the other vanquished. There are no consolation prizes!
Thus, Israel’s survival imperative must dictate that it forgo any expectation of eventual approval from the Arabs. For the foreseeable future, this seductive illusion will remain an unattainable pipe dream. Rather, Israel must reconcile itself to the stern, but sober, conclusion: The most it can realistically hope for is to be grudgingly accepted; the least it must attain is to be greatly feared.
Any more benign policy goals are a recipe for disaster.
To underscore the crucial importance of this seemingly harsh assessment, I would invite any prospective dissenter to consider the consequences of Jewish defeat and Arab victory. Indeed, a cursory survey of the gory regional realities should suffice to drive home the significance of what would accompany such an outcome.
Accordingly, only once a decisive Jewish collective victory has been achieved, can the issue of individual injustice and suffering in the Arab collective be addressed as a policy consideration. Until then, neither the individual well-being nor the societal welfare of the opposing collective can be considered a primary policy constraint or
After all, had the imperative of collective victory not been the overriding factor of the Allies’ strategy in WWII, despite the horrendous civilian causalities that it inflicted on the opposing collective, the world might well have been living in slavery today.
In weighing the question of the fate of individual members of the opposing collective, it is imperative to reiterate the point made at the start of this column: the Palestinian-Arab collective is not the hapless victim of radical terror-affiliated leaders. Quite the opposite. It is, in fact, the societal crucible in which they were forged, and from which they emerged. Indeed, its leadership is a reflection of, not an imposition on, Palestinian-Arab society.
Accordingly, the Palestinian-Arab collective must be considered an implacable enemy—not a prospective peace partner…and it must be treated as such.
Martin Sherman spent seven years in operational capacities in the Israeli defense establishment. He is the founder of the Israel Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), a member of the Habithonistim-Israel Defense & Security Forum (IDSF) research team, and a participant in the Israel Victory Project.
(Cross-referenced at: Adina Kutnicki: A Zionist & Conservative Blog)
