TRAGICALLY, it is nothing new under the sun that those who screech the loudest – yes, conservatives (via their values) are “harmful” to the well-being of the overall public – are, themselves, the ones committing violent acts, or threatening thereof.
IRREFUTABLY, how many times has it been evidenced that the fascist-left (a/k/a democratic socialists) has harmed conservatives, to the degree that violence was (and still is) involved? Countless.
Violence against Republicans is increasing at an alarming rate, and mainstream media outlets and liberal politicians are disturbing silent. No condemnation. No denunciation of violence. Just silence.
Here’s a look at some of the current headlines that are oddly (sarcasm) NOT trending in social media:
Washington Examiner: “Man attempts to stab Republican running against Eric Swalwell“
Daily Caller: “Wyoming GOP Office Set on Fire”
Black Christian News: “Conservative Columnist Goes Into Hiding After Threats of Rape & Death“
But isn’t the left the party of peace and tolerance? Isn’t the left the party that wants common sense gun reform? Isn’t the left hypocritical as hell?
WIBC hosts the Chicks on the Right discussed the left’s deafening silence on Thursday’s show.
ALAS, fellow conservatives, patriots, and freedom lovers – listen up! Afterwards, pay it forward.
STILL yet, before we segue to the meat of the matter, internalize these truths too: those who traditionally lean left are hardly safe from the hammer blows swung by the titans of social media (and others), that is, if they dare to voice opposition to those who have anointed themselves as America’s (totalitarian) speech-minders. Indeed, they view themselves as absolute arbiters: yes, this, not that, is “allowable” within western discourse. Worse than Orwellian.
AS is known, for the most part, the gay community adheres to the Democratic Party and falls into lock-step with its victim-hood talking points. On the other hand, some have broken ranks, albeit on the “down low.” That’s the upside.
NOW, heaven forfend, if a gay activist leaves the tent, trust, hell hath no fury like speech-minders scorned! Exposed. So, consider the (silencing) case of Brandon Straka – the initiator of the #WalkAway campaign, a totally grassroots effort. Way to go, Brandon….high-fives all around. But, as expected, Facebook’s (censoring) “BANNED and BOOM” monitors leaped into action, as evidenced within the definitive book on the subject.
ONTO the meat….
REGULAR readers may know that for the “crime” of exposing this and that, a bull’s-eye (literally) has been placed on this head – to the degree that Islamists, in tandem with their fascist-left helpmates, co-opted said pic from Facebook, thereby, circulating it across the internet to intimidate this voice into silence. How’s that working out??
OF course, the threats at this end are hardly one-offs, that is, against those who ring the alarm bells. More specifically, many are aware that Pamela Geller has been threatened so many times on Facebook (and elsewhere) she has lost count. Threats to rape, slice, and dice her are commonplace. Despite said criminal behavior, she is continuously on the receiving end of Facebook’s “BANNED and BOOM” hammer blows, meanwhile, those who incite to her death are left unmolested. Mind you, law enforcement (under Obama Inc.’s corrupted FBI) has been known to not only ignore the threats, but facilitated real-time bodily harmagainst her through their (mis)handling of ISIS terrorists! Believe it.
BUT there’s more.
Last week, PJ Media contributor and Fox News guest Denise McAllister sent out a powerful tweet denouncing the abortion movement. Little did she know, days later she would be in hiding, scared for her life. When she went public about receiving death and rape threats, pro-abortion Twitter users championed the threats against her.
“At the root of [abortion] hysteria is women’s unhinged desire for irresponsible sex. Sex is their god. Abortion is their sacrament,” McAllister tweeted. “It’s abhorrent as women have flung themselves from the heights of being the world’s civilizing force to the muck and mire of dehumanizing depravity”……
But the real danger came from elsewhere. McAllister told PJ Media that she received death and rape threats, over multiple forms of private communication.
“They are threats outside of Twitter, stating they know where I live,” McAllister said. “Threats of rape and strangling. I spoke to the police. I am on home watch.”
“My children are very frightened,” she added.
On Sunday, she went public about the threats. “I am facing legit death & rape threats because I have dared to call out women who are hysterical about abortion and to challenge them to be responsible and not to elevate sex to the point that they’re willing to kill human life to avoid their responsibilities. How sick is that?” McAllister tweeted….continue reading about the threats here….
LESSON LEARNED: continuous incitement by powerful organs – be they in elected office, media, academia, cultural, or like-minded arenas – against those who refuse to toe the fascist-left’s line has created the (public) space for the legitimization of death threats. You got that? The core two-prong question becomes: is this the new “normal” in America, let alone acceptable in any civilized society? Sure looks like it.
MEANWHILE, Mohammedans have been terrorizing “infidels” within the UK (and all over Europe), still, their PC-castrated police are chasing “hate speech” so-called crimes ala social media. Up is down, down is up…..
MOST significantly, make no mistake: the fascist-left – in the west in general and America in specific, the last bastion of Western Civilization, or of what’s left of it – will use any means at their disposal to thwart those who seek to adhere to the Constitution via its underpinnings of freedom-based ethos. You know, the targets are the oft-cited and maligned “bitter clingers” – indeed, those who dare to embrace such “quaint” ideals.
REGARDLESS, now is not the time to despair, nor to give up. All is not lost. Inexorably, there are remedies – as long as immediate, corrective, and highly bold action is taken. There is no time to dither.
MORE pointedly, those who have read “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad ” (published Sept. 2016) can attest to the following: all of the dangers discussed within its pages – relative to Facebook’s/big tech’s censorship in general and support of Jihad in specific, in collaboration with western power brokers – is coming to an explosive head.
IN fact, dedicated chapters delineate particular remedies and courses of action. Namely, Chapter Eight: “Legal Obstacles And Possible Solutions” zeroes in on class action lawsuits, among other related remedies. Similarly, Chapter Nine: “Possible Political Solutions And Obstacles” targets legislative action, primarily, through monopoly busting via updated antitrust laws, as well as by amending the (no longer viable) Communications Decency Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. Section 230.
LO and behold, as we fast forward to 2018 – merely two years to date after BANNED hit the shelves – demonstrably, its core recommendations are (slowly) coming to fruition. Inexorably, Congress and the DOJ (though the jury is still out on Sessions following through) are getting in on the legislative and legalact(s), as prescribed by the aforementioned definitive book on this crisis. Indeed, most recently, a $1 billion ! dollar class action lawsuit was (blessedly) filed against Facebook and related big tech – again, a core recommendation/remedy within BANNED!
On August 30, Freedom Watch filed a massive class action lawsuit against tech giants Facebook, Google, Twitter, and Apple claiming the companies conspired by entering into an explicit or tacit agreement, in parallel to each other, to restrain trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, which states, “Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal.”
According to Freedom Watch:
Specifically, the class action complaint alleges that the intent and effect of this agreement in restraint of trade is to quash and/or limit advocacy by conservative and pro-Trump public interest groups, advocates and others to further the leftist anti-conservative agendas of these social media giants and to help bring down the Trump presidency and nullify the vote of the millions of citizens who voted for the president. These alleged illegal and anticompetitive actions are an integral part of the so-called “resistance” to remove President Trump and install a leftist government over the 50 states.
The lawsuit states that “the members of the class are so numerous that joinder of all its members is impossible.”
“There are likely to be hundreds or more class members in the United States and worldwide. Furthermore, common questions of fact and law exist as to all class members, including, but not limited to, whether Defendants are engaging in illegal suppression and censorship of politically conservative content,” the lawsuit adds.
According to Freedom Watch, this is the first lawsuit of its kind, adding that it comes “in the wake of mounting proof that the social media giants are illegally restricting free speech of conservatives, and to the contrary furthering and promoting free speech from leftist sources such as CNN, MSNBC, the New York Times, the Washington Post and others…”
“Our inert and compromised Attorney General Jeff Sessions is unwilling to take strong action through his Antitrust Division as he has become the darling of the left given his refusal to prosecute Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, James Clapper, James Comey, prominent Democrats and others who are alleged to have committed crimes, while at the same time giving Robert Mueller carte blanche to proceed with his ‘witch hunt,’” Klayman said.
“The job now falls to Freedom Watch to right this discrimination against conservatives by the social media giants. That our complaint asks for injunctive relief and in excess of a billion dollars in damages, including punitive damages, pales in comparison to what the Commission of the European Union has already levied against such social media giants such as Google for their alleged ruthless tactics in stifling competition.”
In addition to the $1 billion in punitive damages, the lawsuit asks the court to prevent big social media outlets from discriminating and censoring conservative content….continue reading the details here….
ABOVE all else, know this: Democracy, or democratic politics, is based on the primacy of speech and moral suasion, as opposed to the primacy of force and coercion. To wit, when said basic underpinning is at stake and hangs in the balance, well, reality becomes that much clearer. It should.
EFFECTIVELY, once said inviolate line is crossed, the notion of not fighting back must become moot – be it in the political, legal, or street-wise arena, or a combination thereof. After all, once lost, regaining freedom – chiefly, freedom of speech – will take decades to recover, if ever.
STARKLY put: individuals who cherish freedom must pick a side, while they still can. Sitting on the fence is no longer an option, nor is it viable. It is now or never!!
PICK A DOOR – DOOR A: FREEDOM. DOOR B: …..
- This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
- If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}