On Sunday, TikTok influencer and de facto Biden spokesperson Harry Sisson demonstrated his complete ignorance of basic civics when he demanded the weaponized Department of Justice investigate the Supreme Court for following the Constitution.
“The DOJ needs to investigate the Supreme Court. They ruled on a case that didn’t actually happen. It makes no sense. Something very very wrong occurred,” the ignorant twit said on social media.
The DOJ needs to investigate the Supreme Court. They ruled on a case that didn’t actually happen. It makes no sense. Something very very wrong occurred.
— Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) July 2, 2023
The Gateway Pundit correctly noted:
Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?
Democrats on Twitter have spread a bogus theory that the Supreme Court ruled on a case that, as Harry claims, “didn’t actually happen.” However, if they would have actually read the opinion of the court, they would know this is not true, as the court clearly addressed the issue of standing on page 5 of the opinion stating:
“Ultimately, the district court ruled against Ms. Smith. 405 F. Supp. 3d 907, 912 (Colo. 2019). So did the Tenth Circuit. 6 F. 4th, at 1168. For its part, the Tenth Circuit held that Ms. Smith had standing to sue. In that court’s judgment, she had established a credible threat that, if she follows through on her plans to offer wedding website services, Colorado will invoke CADA to force her to create speech she does not believe or endorse. Id., at 1172–1175.
The court pointed to the fact that “Colorado has a history of past enforcement against nearly identical conduct—i.e., Masterpiece Cakeshop”; that anyone in the State may file a complaint against Ms. Smith and initiate “a potentially burdensome administrative hearing” process; and that “Colorado [has] decline[d] to disavow future enforcement” proceedings against her. Id., at 1174. Before us, no party challenges these conclusions.
The cherry on top is the final sentence, “Before us, no party challenges these conclusions.” Meaning that the attorneys who argued the case before the Supreme Court acknowledged that there was sufficient standing to sue.
But “if” can be a mighty big word (e.g., “if” worms carried shotguns, birds probably wouldn’t try to eat them…), and expecting liberals to actually _READ_ and comprehend something seems to be a bit much these days.
Sisson got his lunch handed to him on Twitter:
It is not appropriate to initiate an investigation into the Supreme Court solely based on the outcome of three cases that do not align with your preferences.
— Ethan Harsell (@ethan_harsell) July 2, 2023
Are you on the pipe? I’m sorry but just bc you Liberals don’t have complete communist control over every little thing doesn’t mean you get to “investigate” when it doesn’t go your way.
— ᴊᴀᴄᴋ ᴅᴀɴɢᴇʀ (@AmericazOutlaw) July 2, 2023
The Supreme Court makes perfect sense, duh.
They followed the Constitution, simple enough.
You seem to have a problem with the rulings they have made concerning the Constitution for some reason.
Deal with it lol.
Fun times eh?
— Amtru 13 (@Amtru13) July 3, 2023
Baby boy Harry, just so you know & can understand… that’s not how it works. Now go put on
Your Disney pull-up training underwear & play in the sandbox with the other babies.— Right NOT Left (@sfaz0421) July 3, 2023
Heh…
Yep
— dpaxton (@daveypaxton) July 3, 2023
Him and Crissy believe the website case didn't actually happen
— Mad Bull America (@america_mad) July 2, 2023
— Based and Biased (@based_biased) July 2, 2023
Good question. It makes one wonder: Which comes first, the “liberal” or the “stupid?”
It’s truly amazing how little you actually know but more amazing that anyone believes your drivel.
— Bacon🥓 (@BaconPhoenix61) July 2, 2023
That reminds me of that famous Reagan quote, “The trouble with our Liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.”
Lemme get this straight: you want the DoJ to investigate the highest level of authority of the Judiciary, the branch to whom they would need to make the case for punishment…
What are you hoping to accomplish, exactly?
— Pony-Wan Kenobi ᵁᴸᵀᴿᴬ ᴹᴬᴳᴬ (@Pony_WanKenobi) July 3, 2023
Bingo.
Victor Nieves summed it up nicely:
The Supreme Court is the only conservative branch of government left. Democrats will stop at noting to change that, even if it means packing the Court or siccing the DOJ on conservative Justices. Harry and others continue their attempts to undermine the legitimacy of the Supreme Court simply because conservative Justices refuse to depart from the Constitution.
What’s sad is that we now have a Regime entrenched in the White House that could very well do exactly what Harry wants.
More and more, the modern left is becoming the greatest danger to the Republic.
Exit question: How long before the FBI raids the Supreme Court for following the Constitution?
H/T Gateway Pundit
Related:
- Pete Buttigieg: Christian Web Designer Went Into Business To ‘Provoke’ Legal Fight
- Supreme Court Bashes State’s Anti-Christian Agenda – AGAIN!
- Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Colorado Baker Who Refused Cake for Gay Couple
- Colorado Sued For Limiting Speech That Opposes Abortion
- CRY HARDER LIBS: Pro-Constitution SCOTUS Drops YUGE Rulings For Rule Of Law
Turn your back on Big Tech oligarchs and join the New Resistance NOW! Facebook, Google, and other members of the Silicon Valley Axis of Evil are now doing everything they can to deliberately silence conservative content online, so please be sure to check out our MeWe page here, check us out at ProAmerica Only and follow us at Parler, SocialCross, Speak Your Mind Here, and Gab. You can also follow us on Truth Social here, Twitter at @co_firing_line, and at the social media site set up by members of Team Trump, GETTR.
While you’re at it, be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative front-page founded by ex-military!
And be sure to check out our friends at Trending Views:
