Hatemongers call for murder of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai after vote to kill net neutrality

On Thursday, the Federal Communications Commission voted 3-2 to remove net neutrality rules it put in place two years ago under the Obama administration.  Predictably, this prompted hatemongers on social media to call for the murder of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai.

Here’s a sample of the tweets we found:






Again — this is just a TINY fraction of the tweets we found.  There were many, many more.

So, what’s this all about?

According to The Verge, the rules put in place two years ago “prevented internet providers from blocking and throttling traffic and offering paid fast lanes. They also classified internet providers as Title II common carriers in order to give the measure strong legal backing.”

The report added:

Today’s vote undoes all of that. It removes the Title II designation, preventing the FCC from putting tough net neutrality rules in place even if it wanted to. And, it turns out, the Republicans now in charge of the FCC really don’t want to. The new rules largely don’t prevent internet providers from doing anything. They can block, throttle, and prioritize content if they wish to. The only real rule is that they have to publicly state that they’re going to do it.

Opponents of net neutrality argue that the rules were never needed in the first place, because the internet has been doing just fine. “The internet wasn’t broken in 2015. We were not living in some digital dystopia,” commission chairman Ajit Pai said today. “The main problem consumers have with the internet is not and has never been that their internet provider is blocking access to content. It’s been that they don’t have access at all.”

While that may broadly be true, it’s false to say that all of the harms these rules were preventing are imagined: even with the rules in place, we saw companies block their customers from accessing competing apps, and we saw companies implement policies that clearly advantage some internet services over others. Without any rules in place, they’ll have free rein to do that to an even greater extent.

The vote came after a “messy” public comment period where the FCC received a record 22 million comments.

The reaction on social media really isn’t surprising, since leftists generally react the same way anytime something doesn’t go their way, proving my 2011 thesis that liberalism, at its core, is an ideology of rage and hate.

As a final note, all of the tweets advocating Pai’s murder violate Twitter’s terms of service.  Twitter, however, has shown itself to be quite lax in policing such commentary against conservatives and Republicans.


If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so. And be sure to check out our new MeWe page here.

If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon.

And if you’re as concerned about online censorship as we are, go here and order this book:

Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad
Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad – Source: Author (used with permission)

Joe Newby

A 10-year veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps, Joe ran for a city council position in Riverside, Calif., in 1991 and managed successful campaigns for the Idaho state legislature. Co-author of "Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad," Joe wrote for Examiner.com from 2010 until it closed in 2016 and his work has been published at Newsbusters, Spokane Faith and Values and other sites. He now runs the Conservative Firing Line.

Related Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×