On Thursday, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg made a pledge to protect “election integrity” and democracy from the possibility of foreign meddling after promising to provide details to congressional investigators about ads purchased by Russians during the 2016 elections.
“The integrity of our elections is fundamental to democracy around the world,” said Zuckerberg. “That’s why we’ve built teams dedicated to working on election integrity and preventing governments from interfering in the elections of other nations.”
Here’s his video statement:
But his statement didn’t sit too well with many on social media, and the young executive found himself being criticized from both sides of the political aisle.
“Good God that Zuckerberg video is weird,” said MSNBC’s Chris Hayes — hardly an icon of conservative thought.
Good God that Zuckerberg video is weird.
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) September 21, 2017
Right? It almost as if he knows he's directly involved in the biggest political scandal in US history.
— HereForTheCovfefe (@TreasonWatch) September 21, 2017
“Translation: We’ll censor conservatives and promote liberalism by using our algorithms to shadow ban posts that are unfavorable to us,” said media analyst Mark Dice.
Dice and others compared Zuckerberg to “Big Brother,” the overbearing tyrant in George Orwell’s 1984.
Mark Zuckerberg on election interference in Nov 2016 vs September 2017. pic.twitter.com/ZDrhGEsKhv
— Brandon Wall (@Walldo) September 21, 2017
The Daily Caller reported:
Facebook also announced Thursday that it is providing information related to the 3,000 ads it found earlier in the month to authorities. The ads “appear” to have originated from a Russian entity that may have ties to the Kremlin. While reports have alleged that the social media company was already complying with official investigators, the evidence is now confirmed to be in the hands of special counsel Robert Mueller, who is investigating Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election.
Most of the purveyed advertisements reportedly did not focus on then-Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump or then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, and the total sales amounted to $100,000. As Axios reporter Sara Fischer notes, that is a very small amount, especially in a two-year time span.
The majority of the ads touched on highly contentious social issues, like race, gun rights, gay rights, and immigration. Facebook recently confirmed that Russian operatives deceitfully organized and promulgated political protests in America through the ads, according to The Daily Beast.
And, Politico said, two Democrats, Mark Warner of Virginia, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee and Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, are seeking co-sponsors for legislation targeting social media outlets that run political ads:
The two Democrats are writing legislation that would require web platforms with more than one million users to publicly disclose the names of individuals and organizations that spend more than $10,000 on election-related advertisements.
The sites would also have to provide a copy of the advertisement, and disclose details about the targeted audience, the number of people who view the ad, the time and date it was published, the amount of money charged and the buyer’s contract information.
Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and Warner (D-Va.) say digital platforms merit further scrutiny because they reach much larger audiences than broadcasters, and yet are not subject to the same disclosure requirements.
“We may find more, and if we do, we will continue to work with the government on it,” Zuckerberg said. He also announced that the social media giant will require advertisers to disclose their sponsorship of advertisements and post every version of their paid ads on their individual Facebook pages, Politico added.
“We are in a new world,” Zuckerberg said. “It is a new challenge for internet communities to have to deal with nation states attempting to subvert elections. But if that’s what we must do, we are committed to rising to the occasion.”
Oh heck no..this is a dangerous little man…
— ????????☕Roxanne ☕???????? (@Filledwithhope5) September 21, 2017
What do you think? Let us know in the comment section below.
- Facebook alternative RightBook Not Strictly a Political Venue
- Facebook Feature That Allowed Advertisers To Reach Those Who Want To Burn Jews
- Analysis: Facebook’s new ad guidelines designed to silence conservative sites
- Facebook bans conservative writer for using three laughing emojis
- Facebook punishes user for complaining about death threat from Islamist