Dem Rep. Eric ‘Nuke ‘Em’ Swalwell fails history, denies event that helped launched Revolutionary War

Eric Swalwell, the California Democrat who suggested using nuclear weapons against Americans who refuse to give up their guns, has decided to throw his hat in the ring for the White House.  And it comes as no surprise that gun control has become a major plank in his platform.

Twitchy tells us that in response to his call for a mandatory gun buyback, law professor Elliott Hamilton gave the California leftist a reminder of what helped spark the American Revolution.


Swalwell denied historic fact and responded with a single word: “Nope.”

Will Donald Trump win the 2024 election?

Sounds rather childish to us.

The History Channel, which seems to know a lot more about the American Revolution than Swalwell, explains (Emphasis added):

The Battles of Lexington and Concord, fought on April 19, 1775, kicked off the American Revolutionary War (1775-83). Tensions had been building for many years between residents of the 13 American colonies and the British authorities, particularly in Massachusetts. On the night of April 18, 1775, hundreds of British troops marched from Boston to nearby Concord in order to seize an arms cache. Paul Revere and other riders sounded the alarm, and colonial militiamen began mobilizing to intercept the Redcoat column. A confrontation on the Lexington town green started off the fighting, and soon the British were hastily retreating under intense fire. Many more battles followed, and in 1783 the colonists formally won their independence.

David B. Kopel, Research Director, Independence Institute, and Adjunct Professor of Advanced Constitutional Law, Denver University, Sturm College of Law, wrote an extensive piece on the British gun control measures that led up to the Revolution.

In that piece, he reviewed “…the 1774 import ban on firearms and gunpowder; the 1774-75 confiscations of firearms and gunpowder; and the use of violence to effectuate the confiscations. It was these events that changed a situation of political tension into a shooting war. Each of these British abuses provides insights into the scope of the modern Second Amendment.”

Swalwell, however, dismisses all of this with a single word: “Nope.”

In short, Twitchy said, Swalwell’s knowledge of the events leading to the Revolution doesn’t even seem to rise to “Schoolhouse Rock” levels.

And he now wants to be president.


If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.  You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line.  Please be sure to check out our MeWe page here and check us out at ProAmerica Only here.

If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon and get your conservative pro-Trump gear here.

While you’re at it, be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative front-page founded by ex-military!

And be sure to check out our friends at Trending Views:

Trending Views


Joe Newby

A 10-year veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps, Joe ran for a city council position in Riverside, Calif., in 1991 and managed successful campaigns for the Idaho state legislature. Co-author of "Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad," Joe wrote for Examiner.com from 2010 until it closed in 2016 and his work has been published at Newsbusters, Spokane Faith and Values and other sites. He now runs the Conservative Firing Line.

Related Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×