During Wednesday’s sham impeachment coup hearing led by shifty Comrade Adam Schiff, Rep. Mike Quigley, D-Ill., said that hearsay evidence can be much better than direct evidence.
“I think the American public needs to be reminded that countless people have been convicted on hearsay because the courts have routinely allowed and created needed exceptions to hearsay,” he said. “Hearsay can be much better evidence than direct, as we have learned in painful instances and it’s certainly valid in this instance.”
The Washington Examiner explained:
Courts do not typically allow hearsay evidence because it does not allow defendants to cross-examine the person who made the statement or check for its accuracy, but the rule does come with exceptions, such as statements made that show the subject’s emotional state.
Of course, truth, facts and due process have been thrown out the door by the seditious Democrats working to enact a coup d’état against the president.
- Republicans laugh as Comrade Schiff claims he doesn’t know identity of whistleblower
- Comrade Schiff threatens GOP lawmakers with ethics charges if they mention whistleblower in Soviet-style impeachment hearings
- GOP Rep. Mo Brooks: Alleged ‘Whistleblower’ a Spy Working For Dems, Joe Biden
- Video of the Day: GOP Rep. McCarthy calls impeachment a ‘calculated coup’ orchestrated by Adam Schiff
- Opinion: Republicans need to formally charge Dems, allies with seditious conspiracy to remove Trump
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so. You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line. Facebook, Google and other members of the Silicon Valley Axis of Evil are now doing everything they can to deliberately stifle conservative content online, so please be sure to check out our MeWe page here, check us out at ProAmerica Only and the new social site, Hardcore Conservatives.