It used to be that there was a rule of “five Ws” to guide journalistic reporting. In compiling facts and composing a story, the journalist was supposed to address the questions: who, what, when, where, and why?
It was even thought, in that old-fashioned time, that if a story couldn’t address at least two of those questions, it wasn’t ready for publication. A reporter might know of a what — an event — and a where, and have a story worth notifying the public about, even if he had to fill in the blanks later. But fewer than two questions answered wasn’t really a story at all. You didn’t file a story because you drove down the road and saw a house on your left (a solid where). The house had to at least be on fire (a what).
Apparently, standards are loosening. We regret to put before you the Tweet of the Day, courtesy of our friends over at Liberty Unyielding:
A tape might exist of Trump doing something in an elevator, though exactly where that somewhere is and what that something might be, no one in media can say. That’s because no one in media seems to have seen the tape — or is even confident it exists. https://t.co/yq8cyjfCfm
— HuffPost (@HuffPost) July 15, 2018
Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?
(And yes, this is the blue-checked Twitter account for the Huffington Post media outlet, complete with its slogan “Know what’s real.”)
Short version: “There might be a videotape of something.”
[Ed. ~ The “blue check,” for those not familiar with the term, indicates the account has been “verified” by the leftists at Twitter.]That doesn’t even qualify as a what.
Notice that there is a who in the mix. “All your favorite media outlets (plus Tom Arnold),” on the hunt for a thing to be clarified later, do make a downpayment on a potential story. But the who is still just one element.
Does it tell us something that the one question HuffPo can answer is the who question? Something about human ego and self-focus, maybe?
Does it tell us a bit more that with nothing to go on, the HuffPo story refers to Trump by name?
Given the complete absence of any verifiable facts relevant to that last question, we’ll have to leave you to answer it for yourselves.
Cross-posted with Liberty Unyielding.
Related:
- Journalism professor: NRA more dangerous than ISIS
- Huffington Post writer implies violent ‘purge’ of conservatives
- Trump-supporting Twitter user says HuffPost writer cost husband job, put family in danger
- HuffPo’s Jesse Benn: White NFL Players Who Stand for Anthem ‘Stand for White Supremacy’
- UCCS Flyer and HuffPo — Veterans are racist
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so. You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line and be sure to check out our MeWe page here.
If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon.
