Judicial Watch is sounding the alarm on Muslims that Obama is allowing to enter the United States. In 2014, Obama let in 1,519 Muslims with terror ties, using the excuse that they gave material support to terrorists while under duress. How can they possibly know that? Because the government says they fingerprinted them and their prints don’t match any known terrorists. Come on, get real. What percentage of terrorists do we have fingerprints of? I’d be willing to bet the number isn’t very high.
Prior to 2014, the United States would have automatically forbidden them to enter. It was then that Obama told Immigration Services they could use discretion. This is the same discretion that is used to allow criminal illegal aliens to remain in the country, even if they are members of gangs who go on to murder four people in North Carolina. Everyday, we hear of crimes committed by illegal aliens who have been allowed to stay in the country. Terrorists and terrorists sympathizers pose a much bigger risk.
189 of them are said to have provided material aid to major terrorist organizations such as Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. What could possibly go wrong with that? These are prime candidates to commit workplace violence, lone wolf attacks and random attacks where the motives are not quite clear. (To any Democrat or White House personnel)
Judicial Watch points out the danger in allowing these terrorist sympathizers in:
Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?
“Before the Obama administration tweaked a federal law last year, these foreign nationals would have been banned from the country for supporting terrorist causes.”
“The bottom line is that the U.S. government is allowing them all to stay in the country with rights and benefits afforded to legal residents despite their terrorist connections and associations.”
And the best part is they are eligible for free housing, food, medical, schooling and money, which they can use to buy fertilizer and pressure cookers.
It might not be so bad depending on where they are relocated to. I hear D.C. is lovely this time of year.
Related:
- Admin unilaterally changes law, lets immigrants with limited terror ties in U.S.
- Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg admits working to stifle criticism of ‘migrants’
- Israel’s Iranian attack plan leaked to reporter by Hillary Clinton: Watchdog
- Video: Arabic-speaking European woman says ‘refugees’ threatened to rape her
- Video: Georgia parents outraged after school teaches 6th graders tenets of Islam
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.