There are times when one has to really wonder whether or not our current president truly loves the country he is supposed to be leading. On Saturday, Breitbart.com reported that some 18.7 million legal immigrants eligible for naturalization will not be required to pledge allegiance to the United States, nor will they be required to pledge to help defend America, thanks to Obama appointees at the US Citizenship and Immigration Service.
Worse yet, the changes were made without the consent of Congress.
Tom Tancredo wrote (Emphasis added):
Under the Obama administration’s expansive interpretation of executive authority, legal immigrants seeking citizenship through the nation’s Naturalization process are now exempt from a key part of the Oath of Allegiance.
Immigrants seeking to become citizens no longer have to pledge to “bear arms on behalf of the United States.” They can opt out of that part of the Oath. Nor do they have to cite any specific religious belief that forbids them to perform military service.
Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?
It gets better:
The pledge to help defend America was good enough for the 6.6 million immigrants naturalized since 2005 and good enough for the over 15 million naturalized since 1980, but Obama’s appointees at the USCIS think that is too much to ask of the 18.7 million estimated legal immigrants eligible today for eventual naturalization or the 750,000 who will be naturalized in the coming year.
This radical change was announced a year ago, in July of 2015. Congress did not enact the change in new legislation. There was no congressional debate, no filibuster in the US Senate, and no sit-in in the House to demand that a bill to repeal the USCIS action be brought to a vote.
Moreover, Tancredo says that “unelected bureaucrats at the USCIS can change the wording of the Oath without approval of the people’s representatives in Congress. Strange as it sounds, the law as it stands today allows USCIS bureaucrats great leeway in managing the Naturalization process, so Obama’s actions will not be challenged in federal court.”
Yet, in view of Obama’s actions, why doesn’t Congress change the law and take control of the Oath of Allegiance? So far, there is no indication that the Republican leadership will do so. If they won’t even bar Islamic terrorists from the refugee program, why should we expect them to protect the Oath of Allegiance? Some members of Congress will grumble, make speeches and issue press releases, but the Republican leadership will do nothing.
And that’s the really sad part — Democrats take to the floor in a childish temper tantrum over gun control, but for some reason, Republicans aren’t doing anything about this. Why?
Such is the state of the nation as we approach this 240th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence. Some Americans see great irony in the British declaring their independence from the tyranny of Brussels while Americans quietly accept the new tyranny of Washington, DC.
Welcome to Obama’s fundamentally-transformed America…
- Hypocrisy: List of 26 gun-owning Democrats who participated in anti-gun sit-in
- Video: Dianne Feinstein says Americans must prove their innocence if they’re on a watch list
- Calls for Texas independence grow in wake of Brexit
- White House falsely accuses GOP of selling guns to ISIS
- Democrat senators falsely accuse GOP of selling guns to ISIS, attack gun owners