NJ Federal Appeals Court Upholds Limits on Firearms Magazine Size

On Wednesday, a NJ Federal Appeals court upheld the state restrictions on the size of gun magazines to 10 rounds. The court ruled that the law did not affect the Second Amendment because people could still purchase more than one 10 round magazine.

NJ Federal appeals
New Jersey’s law against magazines over 10 rounds upheld by Federal Appeals court

The Hill reported,

A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that a New Jersey law banning the sale of high-capacity magazines in the state does not violate the Constitution, handing a victory to gun control advocates and the state’s attorney general.

take our poll - story continues below

What is your top alternative to Facebook? - FIXED

  • What is your top alternative to Facebook?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Conservative Firing Line updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: Anti-gun demagogue David Hogg issues ridiculous tweet about illegal aliens, gets shredded on Twitter

The three-judge panel said in their ruling that the law limiting the size of a magazine to 10 rounds did not violate the constitutionally protected right of New Jersey residents to self defense and did not present an undue burden for gun owners who currently own magazines that would become illegal under the new law, citing their ability to obtain new magazines or register guns that cannot be modified to hold 10 shots or less.

The philosophy behind limiting the size of gun magazines is that “people have time to get away” when a shooter reloads. Five other circuit courts have upheld the magazine limits, according to the Washington Times. There are currently 8 states plus the District of Columbia that have restrictions on magazines.

“The record demonstrates that when there are pauses in shooting to reload or for other reasons, opportunities arise for victims to flee, as evidenced by the 2017 Las Vegas and 2013 D.C. Navy Yard shootings … or for bystanders to intervene, as in the 2018 Tennessee Waffle House shooting and 2011 Arizona shooting involving Representative Gabrielle Giffords.” NJ Federal court ruling

The only dissenting opinion was a Trump appointee.

“We must treat the right to keep and bear arms like other enumerated rights. We may not water it down and balance it away based on our own sense of wise policy.” Judge Stephanos Bibas

H/T Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children

Related:

If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.  You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line.  Please be sure to check out our MeWe page here and check us out at ProAmerica Only here.

If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon and get your conservative pro-Trump gear here.

And while you’re at it, be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative front-page founded by ex-military!

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.