On Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi falsely characterized a bill that would prohibit abortions during the final four months and could not tell the difference between what abortionist Kermit Gosnell did to babies born alive and abortions that take place moments before the baby is born.
“As a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this,” she said. “I don’t think it should have anything to do with politics.”
The Weekly Standard reported:
Pelosi falsely claimed the bill that passed out of committee on Wednesday would ban all abortions, when in fact it’s simply a prohibition on abortion during the final four months of pregnancy (with an exception for when the life and physical health of the mother is at risk), the point at which science indicates babies can feel pain and some babies can survive long-term if born.
“They would make it a federal law that there would be no abortion in our country,” Pelosi claimed.
Video of the exchange can be seen here, courtesy of the Weekly Standard:
Pelosi also went after one of the reporters present. John McCormack provided a transcript:
THE WEEKLY STANDARD: Madam Leader, you mentioned the bill that passed out of the House Judiciary committee. Members who have proposed that bill have done that in the wake of this murder trial in Philadelphia. They argue that there really isn’t much of a moral difference between what someone like Dr. Gosnell did to infants born at 23, 24, 25 weeks into pregnancy, and what can happen [legally] at a clinic down the road in Maryland where a doctor says he’ll perform an elective abortions 28 weeks into pregnancy. So the question I have for you is what is the moral difference between what Dr. Gosnell did to a baby born alive at 23 weeks and aborting her moments before birth?
PELOSI: You’re probably enjoying that question a lot, I can see you savoring it. [Laughter in press corps] Let me just tell you this.
TWS: Could you answer the question?
PELOSI: Let me just tell you this. What was done in Philadelphia was reprehensible and everybody condemned it. For them to decide to disrespect a judgment a woman makes about her reproductive health is reprehensible. Next question.
TWS: So what’s the moral difference? I just asked a simple question. … What’s the moral difference then between 26 weeks elective abortion and the killing of that same infant born alive. This is the issue that they’re trying to–
PELOSI: This is not the issue. They are saying that there’s no abortion. It would make it a federal law that there would be no abortion in our country. You’re taking the extreme case. You’re taking the extreme case. And what I’m saying to you what happened in Philadelphia was reprehensible. And I do not think you.
PELOSI: I’m not going to have this conversation with you because you obviously have an agenda. You’re not interested in having an answer.
PELOSI: I’ve responded to you to the extent that I’m going to respond to you. Because I want to tell you something. As the mother of five children, my oldest child was 6 years old the day I brought my 5th child home from the hospital, as a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this. I don’t think it should have anything to do with politics. And that’s where you’re taking it and I’m not going there.
TWS [after tape ends]: It was a simple question. You didn’t answer.
- Nancy Pelosi says Catholic faith ‘compels’ her to support gay marriage
- Harry Reid: Funding Planned Parenthood more important than national defense
- Sarah Palin: Nancy Pelosi a ‘dingbat’, ‘perfect spokesperson’ for radical left
- Nancy Pelosi threatens to reveal dirt on Newt Gingrich ‘when the time is right’
- Nancy Pelosi: ‘God bless’ the Wall Street protesters
- Speaker Pelosi calls for probe into opponents of ground zero mosque
- Nancy Pelosi on House floor: John Boehner is Darth Vader
- Nancy Pelosi falsely claims GOP budget will starve millions of seniors
Be sure to check out our Headlines page to see what else our contributors are covering.