Did Martha Raddatz just push for gun control advocacy journalism?

Martha Raddatz. (Screen capture, YouTube, ABC)

ABC’s Martha Raddatz criticized fellow journalists in the wake of last week’s shooting of Congressman Steve Scalise, suggesting that they are “too numb” to such things and may be “massively desensitized to the carnage,” but did she press for gun control advocacy journalism in the process?

Media Matters has posted a transcript of her Sunday remarks on ABC’s This Week. She quoted anti-gun Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy’s Facebook post, in which he said this:

“What does it say about us as a country that we can so easily move on from such a seemingly cataclysmic event? Are we so jaundiced to gun violence and mass shootings that it only takes us 24 hours now to revert back to business as usual?”—Sen. Chris Murphy (D-CT)

Raddatz had this to add: “Senator Murphy is right.”

But is he? As Raddatz noted, 262 people were killed last week in the United States and 559 more were wounded. She seems to want reporters to dwell on those “gun violence” deaths. It seems clear that Sen. Murphy wants the country to dwell, but he has an agenda that has not been friendly to the Second Amendment or honest citizens who own firearms.

Raddatz mentioned the one-year anniversary of the Orlando Pulse nightclub mass shooting. She didn’t mention that it was the work of a wannabe terrorist.

She mentioned the nine people killed at the Emanuel A.M.E. Church in Charlston, but didn’t note that the triggerman was motivated by racism.

And very few are dwelling on the fact that the man who shot Scalise and three others last week was a far left hate monger with a list of conservative Republicans upon whom his attention had focused.

James Hodgkinson, the Illinois would-be political assassin was the only person killed during the Wednesday attack. His actions, however, brought a lot of focus on the climate of hatred, much of it visceral, that many believe has permeated politics in this country since Donald Trump was elected.

Instead of focusing on that, it appears a fair number of people want to shift the spotlight to guns. In Hodgkinson’s case, firearms he owned were purchased legally under the tough gun control laws imposed in Illinois. Until gun dealers and the FBI’s National Instant Check System (NICS) add clairvoyance to their process, no system will be able to catch such people and those who believe otherwise are probably kidding themselves.

As the past weeks have demonstrated in the United Kingdom, determined killers don’t need guns to carry out mass mayhem. Bombs and motor vehicles cause plenty of casualties.

Guns are not the common denominator among mass killers. That dubious distinction belongs to hate, whether born with religious or political extremism, or a mixture of both.

That journalists don’t dwell on such outrages may be understandable considering the 24/7 news cycle that has become the new normal. Raddatz may be right to criticize that part of the business, but maybe wrong about “gun violence.”

Related Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×