Forecast calls for scattered penis…
It’s not that often that a scholarly paper hits the politically correct trifecta of slamming the evil patriarchy, man-made global warming, and the ever-oppressive capitalist system.
Thankfully, despite the best efforts of Doctors Peter Boghossian and James Lindsay, it still hasn’t happened.
Going by the pen names of Peter Boyle and Jamie Lindsay, the EdD and PhD, respectively, purposefully wrote a hoax academic research paper that was liberally peppered with “3,000 words of utter nonsense posing as academic scholarship.”
The duo took to Skeptic.com to drop of couple of dimes on themselves and simultaneously call-out academia for accepting deliberate drivel as enlightened fact;
The androcentric scientific and meta-scientific evidence that the penis is the male reproductive organ is considered overwhelming and largely uncontroversial.
That’s how we began. We used this preposterous sentence to open a “paper” consisting of 3,000 words of utter nonsense posing as academic scholarship. Then a peer-reviewed academic journal in the social sciences accepted and published it.
With regards to Cogent, they bill themselves on their Who We Are section that “We are a forward-thinking partner to the research communities, with journals across all areas of academia from education to engineering and medicine to mathematics.”
Another prime example of politically correct gibberish accepted as legitimate academics tackles everything the teachers of our children embrace as fact;
Toxic hypermasculinity derives its significance directly from the conceptual penis and applies itself to supporting neocapitalist materialism, which is a fundamental driver of climate change, especially in the rampant use of carbon-emitting fossil fuel technologies and careless domination of virgin natural environments.