The horror! On Sunday, The Hill reported that far-left “news” outlets CNN and the Washington Post published reports that Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is (gasp) using social media to express her conservative points of view.
Oh no! Say it ain’t so! Will the Republic survive such an onslaught of free expression by a spouse of a sitting Supreme Court Justice? Apparently not, according to the report.
The Hill stated:
CNN and The Washington Post published separate reports in recent days highlighting Thomas’s use of social media. She has in recent months shared posts on Facebook alleging Democrats committed voter fraud, claiming survivors of a mass shooting at a Parkland, Fla., high school are a threat to the country, and that Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) was the subject of “false accusations” because he “threatens the elite.”
Thomas previously founded Liberty Central, a nonprofit conservative advocacy group.
Trending: Cartoon of the Day: The Squad
The Post reported that Thomas’s spread of baseless claims and conservative commentary has generated criticism from some who worry she is further politicizing the Supreme Court.
Translation: How DARE a conservative express her opinion! This simply will not do!
Of course, when Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg called Trump a “faker,” CNN chalked it up to her “well-known candor.” Of course.
So, who, exactly, is scrutinizing Mrs. Thomas? We’re not sure and the report doesn’t specifically tell us, but we suspect it’s probably the thought police at the Post and CNN, both of which are notoriously anti-Trump.
Reaction on Twitter? Here’s just a few tweets, courtesy of Twitchy:
“Clarence Thomas’s wife not entitled to own opinion, says media.” https://t.co/ynPcrRtDw1— Nick Short (@PoliticalShort) December 31, 2018
For that matter, it seems that no one whose opinions fall to the right of Josef Stalin is apparently allowed to actually express them.
She's entitled to her own opinion, what's the problem here?— Poleetico Heespánico (@PoleeticoH) December 31, 2018
So wives should remain silent and subservient to their husbands?— Karen the Adorable Deplorable (@KinGrandPrairie) December 31, 2018
Hmmm… Sure sounds that way to us. Of course, that only applies to conservatives…
Ginni Thomas has dared challenge the propaganda organizers and agitation of CNN... there fixed it for you— rayray (@PlanetRayRay) December 31, 2018
The Hill report added:
Deborah L. Rhode, a law professor and scholar of legal ethics at Stanford University, told the news outlet that “members of the Supreme Court and their families need to think about ways that their public conduct can affect popular trust.”
Thomas’s defenders told the Post that she has a right to share her views, and have said they know her as a strong and patriotic woman.
Thomas did not respond to interview requests for the Post and was not interviewed by CNN.
Exit question: How long before CNN gets Mrs. Thomas banned from social media?
- 2018 a banner year for Silicon Valley censorship; How much farther will they go in 2019?
- Liberal hatemongers celebrate Justice Scalia’s death, pray Clarence Thomas dies next
- Kavanaugh Allegations are Psychological Terrorism and it’s Time They End
- Welcome to ‘1984’: ‘The Good Censor’ shows Google’s Orwellian goals to abandon free speech for ‘safety and civility’
- WaPo Propagandist Jennifer Rubin Proves She Is A Pig And An Awful Human Being
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so. You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line. Please be sure to check out our MeWe page here and check us out at ProAmerica Only here.
While you’re at it, be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative front-page founded by ex-military!