AS a young student of geopolitics (a sub-section of political science), this writer learned early on that its basis, for all practical purposes, is slippery as ice. The contrast couldn’t be any starker to a secondary area of immersion, that is, forensics. Akin to night and day. Effectively, one is non-scientific – despite the jibber-jabber from political and academic quarters – and the other is decidedly science-based. Polar opposites.
Nevertheless, despite the amorphous state of geopolitics, it does have a starting and entry point. To wit, said openings should be viewed in terms of geography and power politics; with the goal being a so-called “grand strategy” for both wartime and peacetime based on a nation’s geographical location (and standing) on the global stage.
IN this regard, effectively, nation-states base their foreign policy objectives upon “grand strategies”, be it purposefully or inadvertently. Generally, they tie into the leadership’s global ambitions. Still, at times, they operate in opposition to a promised set of domestic arrangements and parameters. In turn, it is this push and pull, a “tug of war”, if you will, that often becomes the locus of domestic, populist conflict.
Who would you vote for if the elections were held today? (1)
THAT being established, the U.S. – as the leader of the free world via its exceptional status – has a special obligation to protect the cornerstones of Western Civilization. Like it or not. At the same time, this so-called role of “policeman” can create tension and friction (directly or indirectly), domestically and foreign-wise. Nevertheless, when a patriotic POTUS is at the helm, it is far easier to entrust that the overall national interest is the primary driving force and factor, as mandated.
ALL of which circles back to Iran’s terrorist-mastermind mullahs, and the global threat that they pose – not only to Israel, the wider Middle East, Europe, and the west at large, but to the U.S. directly.
INEXORABLY, it is under the above informational and instructional manuals that two piggybacks, A & B, are housed and must be viewed. Incontestably, they intersect and outline the ultimate betrayal(s) of Barack HUSSEIN Obama and assorted henchpeople; an anti-American POTUS (and regime) who endangered the nation to the nth degree, as well as the west in toto.
- Ominously, the most significant indictment against Barack HUSSEIN Obama, bar none, became housed within this site, Oct. 3, 2015. Resultant, it ricocheted across the internet at lightening speed, thankfully. This is so because there is nothing more dangerous than allowing the most lethal weapons known to man, WMD’s, to become part of a genocidal regime’s arsenal – whose stated goal is to destroy America, Israel, and, by extrapolation, western civilization. As such, history will record that the onus is upon Obama. Primarily, he provided an umbrella and a shield; an 8-year window to the Mullocracy ala the time, the space, and the financial wherewithal (to the tune of billions) to accelerate their pursuit of WMD’s, as evidenced within the following policy paper, one which this investigative journalist contributed to.
Accordingly, once again, a smattering of its indicting excerpts are presented. Without further ado:“House Of Bribes: How The United States Led The Way To A Nuclear Iran” (pdf here) houses a bullet-proof evidentiary trail. Beyond the (civilized) pale, too.
Its contributors include:
Adina Kutnicki, Andrea Shea King, Dr. Ashraf Ramelah, Benjamin Smith, Brent Parrish, Charles Ortel, Denise Simon, Dick Manasseri, Gary Kubiak, Hannah Szenes, Right Side News, Marcus Kohan, General Paul E. Vallely, Regina Thomson, Scott Smith, Terresa Monroe-Hamilton, Colonel Thomas Snodgrass, Trevor Loudon, Wallace Bruschweiler, and William Palumbo.
“I think that the American companies will be welcomed in Iran… This is not a game for junior companies, and I call juniors anything below a billion-dollar market cap. This is a big-money game.”
– An American Portfolio Manager, July 2015
Table of Contents
The Trailblazers: Namazi & Nemazee
National Iranian-American Council (NIAC)
The Open (Iranian) Society of George Soros
Valerie Jarrett – The Puppetmaster
Complicity of the GOP
The Iranian nuclear deal is a full capitulation to Iran’s terrorist mastermind Mullahs, and the latest in a series of betrayals of the American people and allies by the Obama administration. At the highest level of the administration, Barack Obama’s Senior Advisor, the Iranian-born Valerie Jarrett, prioritized rapprochement with the terror state. Throughout the process and negotiations, she had the backing of billionaire investor (and Obama-backer) George Soros, and his multi-headed network of tax-exempt foundations. Their efforts were driven by deep-rooted anti-Semitism and personal greed. Meanwhile, since the mid-1990s, a small but very connected Iranian lobby (funded, in part, by George Soros) has been laying the groundwork for normalizing relations with Tehran. Operating through a variety of non-governmental organizations and political action committees, the lobby courted Democrat and Republican politicians. With the election of (Soros-backed) Obama in 2008, the Iranian lobby had very receptive ears in the White House. International business interests were courted and effectively bribed with access to Iranian markets, until finally the deal was realized, approved, and sealed by a vote of the United Nations Security Council.
Thus far, the reports and exposés issued by the New Coalition of Concerned Citizens* have focused on the threat posed by Islamists to American sovereignty. The Qatar Awareness Campaign brought to light extensive influence network of the State of Qatar and their ruling al-Thani family. The Betrayal Papers explained the Muslim Brotherhood’s domination of the Obama administration’s agenda and policies, foreign and domestic.
This report will detail the sinister influence of the small, yet well-connected and very powerful, Iran lobby. Though the Iran lobby’s highest level contacts are prominent Democrats, their reach spans both major political parties. Like previous exposés, this investigation will mention familiar names, including George Soros, Valerie Jarrett, and the United Nations.
Iran is widely regarded by counterterrorism experts as the heart of Islamic radicalism, and the point of origin for terrorism with a specific geopolitical agenda (i.e., the creation of an Islamic Caliphate, much like the Islamic State, but dominated by Shiites, not Sunnis). With the eager embrace of a legacy-hungry Obama administration, the Iran lobby managed to achieve a deal which makes the United States the de facto most powerful backer of Islamic terrorism in the world.
How did this happen?…..continue the frightening journey here…..
- Irrefutably, let it also be stated for the record: absent the above, the following strategic assessment from DEBKAfile – a premiere military intelligence site, with a resounding analytical success rate in highly explosive arenas – wouldn’t assert:
The Israeli intelligence 2020 assessment published on Tuesday, Jan 14, estimates that if Iran continues its nuclear program at the present pace, it will have 25 kgs of highly enriched uranium by winter 2020 and a missile capable of carrying a nuclear bomb in two years.
This estimate matches the forecast Israel made five years ago, DEBKAfile’s sources note, when six world powers signed a nuclear accord with Iran for curtailing its development of a nuclear bomb. What happened was that the $150bn reward received by Iran was invested in advanced weapons systems and in establishing paramilitary groups under its control for planting around Israel’s borders.
The assessment released today is hardly compatible with another estimate in the 2020 intelligence paper that rates as low the prospects of war by Israel’s enemies. Does that mean that those enemies, Iran and Hizballah, will hold off until they accumulate a stock of nuclear warheads? The most pressing question is this: What is Israel doing about the advancing nuclear threat?
Its leaders have refrained from publicly discussing the threat since tensions between the US and Iran became critical. Last week, President Donald Trump declared: We will never allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon. On Tuesday, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu said on Twitter: “We know exactly what’s happening with the Iranian nuclear program. Iran thinks it can achieve nuclear weapons. I reiterate: Israel won’t allow Iran to achieve nuclear weapons. I also call on all Western countries to impose snap back sanctions at the UN now.”
He was referring to the decision taken earlier in the day by the UK, France and Germany, co-signatories of the 2015 nuclear accord, to activate the dispute mechanism embodied in that accord after repeated Iranian breaches.
This process is long and cumbersome. Hence Netanyahu’s impatient demand. Complaints are first referred to a Joint Commission, then to the foreign ministers, and finally to the UN Security Council, with long pauses in between. For Iran’s non-compliance with its obligations, a vote could “snap back” the international and multilateral sanctions lifted under the accord.
IPSO facto, is there even a scintilla of a doubt, as per the exponentially grave damage an anti-American POTUS can pose to the nation, let alone the free world? If not, why not?
- This message contains content that has been blocked by our security systems.
- If you think you’re seeing this by mistake, please let us know. Yes, additional “proof-in-the pudding” as to why “BANNED: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad” had to be written!}