Remember when leftists told us that Neil Gorsuch was just another Trump stooge? On Tuesday, the Washington Examiner reported that the Supreme Court decided in favor of an immigrant facing deportation after being convicted for residential burglary. Gorsuch sided with liberals on the court and cast the deciding vote in the case.
According to the Examiner:
The court ruled 5-4, with Justice Elena Kagan delivering the opinion. The justices affirmed a decision from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which found in 2015 that a provision of federal immigration law subjecting immigrants to deportation if they are convicted of a “crime of violence” was too vague.
take our poll - story continues belowShould Congress Remove Biden from Office?
Completing this poll grants you access to Conservative Firing Line updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.Justice Neil Gorsuch, nominated by President Trump and considered a member of the court’s conservative wing, cast the deciding vote by joining Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Kagan, who make up the court’s liberal wing.
Melissa Quinn summarized the case:
James Garcia Dimaya, a lawful permanent resident who immigrated to the U.S. from the Philippines at 13, brought the case.
Dimaya was convicted of residential burglary in 2007 and 2009, though neither of the crimes involved violence. The Department of Homeland Security under the Obama administration, though, sought to deport Dimaya in 2010 after determining the crimes could be considered crimes of violence.
The Justice Department’s Board of Immigration Appeals agreed with the Obama administration’s conclusion that Dimaya should be deported, as one of the convictions constituted an “aggravated felony” and therefore made him subject to mandatory deportation.
But the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed and decided the definition of “aggravated felony” under the Immigration and Nationality Act, which incorporates the definition of “crime of violence,” was unconstitutionally vague.
His vote didn’t sit too well with many:
Gorsuch blows it, big time https://t.co/YJ3ECLfI4c
— Mark R. Levin (@marklevinshow) April 17, 2018
Gorsuch is now to the left of Roberts and Kennedy on criminal aliens. Very dangerous decision grounded in a flawed philosophy
— Daniel Horowitz (@RMConservative) April 17, 2018
BETRAYED: Gorsuch Rules Criminal Immigrant Can Stay, No Deportation https://t.co/9mOsNQkALh
— Big League Politics (@bigleaguepol) April 17, 2018
https://twitter.com/ASavageNation/status/986264483285880834
But, others argued, Gorsuch did the right thing and upheld the Constitution.
Read the case. Gorsuch cast the right vote in Sessions v. Dimaya, IMO. He starts with "Vague laws invite arbitrary power" and is convincing from there. https://t.co/VQfASEu5Po
— Jeff B. tried to do his best, but he could not (@EsotericCD) April 17, 2018
https://twitter.com/HashtagGriswold/status/986263858326179842
https://twitter.com/EWErickson/status/986254776978563072
https://twitter.com/flybull1/status/986276565507018752
According to the Examiner, the Court heard the case last year, but was deadlocked in a 4-4 vote, meaning that Gorsuch made the deciding vote. It was heard again on the first day of the new term, which began in October.
What do you think? Did Gorsuch do the right thing? Let us know in the comment section below.
Related:
- Trump pledge fulfilled: Gorsuch confirmed to U.S. Supreme Court
- Desperate last-minute ploy? Gorsuch plagiarism allegation surfaces
- Sen. Murray’s Gorsuch Opposition Triggers Hypocrisy Question
- Lying liar Tim Kaine falsely accuses Neil Gorsuch of calling contraception ‘wrongdoing’
- Dems double down on effort to deny Gorsuch SCOTUS confirmation
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so. And be sure to check out our new MeWe page here.
If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon.
