A fight has been launched by the Liberty Justice Center and the Upper Midwest Law Center over a Minnesota law that now “criminalizes core political speech.”
A report from the LJC explains Gov. Tim Walz, a leftist in Minnesota’s politics, a few months ago signed into law a plan from the legislature that “includes a provision allowing the state to prosecute anyone who expresses disfavored opinions about Minnesota’s voting laws within 60 days of an election.”
The lawsuit charges that that violates Minnesotans’ free speech rights by outlawing speech about undecided legal questions, “such as whether the state’s constitution allows felons the right to vote before their sentences have ended, rather than afterwards.”
The lead plaintiff is the Minnesota Voters Alliance, a nonpartisan group that aims to boost public awareness of election issues in the state.
Is America headed for a recession?
The case in federal court in Minnesota charges that the lawmakers simply decided to ignore the requirements of the U.S. Constitution when they adopted their plan to pursue the “criminalization of political discussion about elections.”
The complaint seeks the court’s declaration that the state’s “Speech Code” violates federal law and the U.S. Constitution, as well as an injunction prohibiting the state from enforcing its speech ode.
“There is no justification for this prior restrain on speech,” the complaint charges. “The Speech Code is not narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling government interest, and the Speech Code is not actually necessary to address the speculative evil it supposedly targets.”
Further, it “imposes an objectively reasonable chill on the speech of any person.”
It cites as an example the political statement that, “Felons still serving their sentences do not have a right to vote in Minnesota.”
That’s supported by the “plain reading of Article VII, section I, of the Minnesota Constitution” as well as state supreme court precedent, the filing explains.
“However, a new Minnesota law … threatens anyone who utters such a phrase, or other like phrases, with criminal and civil penalties.”
It bans any “materially false” comment “within 60 days of an election.”
Topics covered include details about an election and the qualifications for or restrictions on voter eligibility.
Compounding the problem, lawmakers said anyone to claims an “injury” from any such speech can “enforce” the ban.
“Those potential plaintiffs in such a lawsuit – who could be any Minnesotan claiming supposed ‘injury’ from speech – are entitled, if they prevail, to recover damages, costs of investigation, and attorney fees.”
That means someone commenting about the eligibility of convicted felons to vote would face “potentially thousands of dollars in civil penalties…”
The intent of the law actually was revealed, the complaint notes, when supporters claimed it would protect voters “from intimidation, harassment or anything that would hinder them from voter.”
It also condemns “false” information without explaining how that would be defined.
And challenging the law? A leftist explained that would be “nothing more than an attempt to suppress the vote of certain members in our communities….”
The complaint illegally suppresses speech by imposing a fear of prosecution.
Specifically, the complaint charges, Minnesota lawmakers directly have created a conflict with the First Amendment, which states, “Congress shall make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.”
IMPORTANT NOTE TO WND READERS: Believe it or not, today’s high priests of climate-change apocalypse are correct in predicting that in just a few short years, the earth will become miserable, wretched and almost uninhabitable by human beings. But the grim future they envision won’t come about because of “catastrophic climate change,” but rather, because of the implementation of their completely insane and truly catastrophic agenda.
As Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore recently admitted, “If they actually achieve Net Zero, at least 50% of the population would die of hunger and disease.” Likewise, writes energy expert and author Alex Epstein: “Today’s proposed policies to rapidly eliminate fossil fuel use would, if fully implemented, have truly apocalyptic consequences – making the world an impoverished, dangerous, and miserable place for most people.”
Question: When the scientific case for global warming apocalypse consists primarily of a 1-degree Celsius rise in temperature over more than 130 years, what explains the obsession with an imminent, climate-caused end of the world?
Although many groups have been drawn into the Climate Change Cult – from the news media (which has warned of climate catastrophe, either global warming or a “new ice age,” for over a century!), to innocent school kids indoctrinated by hysterical leftist teachers, to liberal Democrats who claim “climate change” will destroy the earth in a few years – the REAL villains are the national and global elites who KNOW the apocalyptic global warming religion is just a cruel hoax, but promote and exploit it as a means of accomplishing their ultimate goal: Transforming and ruling the world.
The heart and soul of today’s bizarre, pagan climate-change religion, and the global elites’ strategies for using it to rule all of mankind, is powerfully exposed and illuminated in the September issue of WND’s critically acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine, an issue titled “CULT OF THE CLIMATE APOCALYPSE: The elites’ breathtaking strategy for ruling the world.” WHISTLEBLOWER is available in both the popular print edition and a state-of-the-art digital version, either single issues or discounted annual subscriptions.
For 25 years, WND has boldly brought you the news that really matters. If you appreciate our Christian journalists and their uniquely truthful reporting and analysis, please help us by becoming a WND Insider!
Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].
This article was originally published by the WND News Center.
- Biden’s War On Free Speech Is Against Political Opposition Itself
- ‘There Is No Place to Hide. Are You Next?’: Dinesh D’Souza Releases Trailer to “Police State,” A Film Documenting America’s Growing Political Persecution
- To Hell With Free Speech: A Draconian New Law Went Into Effect August 25th Institutes Extreme Censorship Of The Internet On A Global Basis
- Democrats Want Free Speech, But Only For Themselves, Analysis Warns
- To Hell With The First Amendment: Democrat Stacey Plaskett Defends Censorship, Claims ‘Free Speech Is Not an Absolute’
Turn your back on Big Tech oligarchs and join the New Resistance NOW! Facebook, Google, and other members of the Silicon Valley Axis of Evil are now doing everything they can to deliberately silence conservative content online, so please be sure to check out our MeWe page here, check us out at ProAmerica Only and follow us at Parler, SocialCross, Speak Your Mind Here, and Gab. You can also follow us on Truth Social here, Twitter at @co_firing_line, and at the social media site set up by members of Team Trump, GETTR.
Give a middle finger to unaccountable global censors and big tech fascists. Bookmark this site, sign up for our newsletter, and check back often.