Feminist icon Gloria Steinem falsely claims Trump not president, lost election by 10 million votes

By
Joe Newby
-
Share on GAB

While speaking at the Massachusetts Conference for Women on Wednesday, 83-year-old feminist icon Gloria Steinem falsely claimed that Donald Trump really isn’t the president and in her version of reality, lost by — get this — 10 million votes.

“He’s not the president,” Steinem said. “He lost by 10 million votes. I never called him president once, he’s the harasser-in-chief and part of the reason, at this point, people are so frustrated.”

According to NECN.com:

The longtime activist for women’s rights said Massachusetts had long played a key role in the feminist movement and gave praise to Republican Gov. Charlie Baker.

“Glad to be in a state where the governor helps keep us from seeing the Republican Party being taken over by the invasion of the body-snatchers,” she said.

A line of women waited for a chance to meet or take a photo with Steinem, calling her a hero and a role model. But she told them not to make her an icon, saying everyone has to do their part in this movement.

“Don’t listen to me, listen to yourself,” Steinem added. “You know what you love, what you care about, what you need, what you want to do. Find support for it and do it.”

Naturally, her comments were soundly ridiculed by the reality-based community on social media.

For that 10 million vote claim:

https://twitter.com/NancyPeluzi/status/939594975561633796

Of course, we don’t elect presidents by the popular vote…

Indeed.  Naturally, the so-called “mainstream media,” known here as the anti-Trump Democrat-media complex, will never question her claim.  At this rate, liberals will soon be saying that Hillary Clinton — the most evil person ever nominated to the White House by a major party — actually got 100 percent of the vote.

Good luck with that.  Liberals have made it clear they have no intention of ever getting over or accepting Trump’s victory, making them direct threats to American democracy according to Clinton’s own definition.

No doubt she needs it, but chances are she’ll never avail herself of it…

That it is.

Related:

If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.  And be sure to check out our new MeWe page here.

If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon.

And if you’re as concerned about online censorship as we are, go here and order this book:

Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad
Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad – Source: Author (used with permission)
Share on GAB

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, profanity, vulgarity, doxing, or discourteous behavior. If a comment is spam, instead of replying to it please hover over that comment, click the ∨ icon, and mark it as spam. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain fruitful conversation.