If Hillary Clinton and Democrats win Tuesday’s election, experts warn, any criticism of Islam could be made illegal, Paul Bremmer reported at WND on Sunday.
The article starts with a brief overview of a legal case against Dutch politician Geert Wilders, who went on trial this week on charges of “inciting discrimination and hatred of Moroccans.”
Bremmer explained:
The charges stem from a March 2014 rally in which Wilders asked a room full of supporters if they wanted “more or fewer Moroccans” in the country. When the audience chanted, “Fewer, fewer!” Wilders responded, “Well, we’ll arrange that, then.”
Will this presidential election be the most important in American history?
This led the Dutch government to prosecute Wilders for “offending members of a group based on their race, and hate speech and discrimination,” according to the New York Times.
In short, Wilders is being prosecuted for non-politically correct speech, and he actually faces two years in jail.
Could this happen in America if Democrat Hillary Clinton wins? Some say yes.
Bremmer added:
“While she was secretary of State, the U.S. voted for U.N. Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18, which calls for criminalization of ‘incitement to religious hatred,’ a subjective category that allows for the criminalization of any dissenting voice,” Geller told WND.
Philip Haney, a retired Customs and Border Protection officer and author of “See Something, Say Nothing: A Homeland Security Officer Exposes the Government’s Submission to Jihad,” agreed an American politician could be prosecuted for “hate speech” if UN HRC Resolution 16/18 and the related “Istanbul Process” are more fully enforced in the U.S. He said there will inevitably come a point when Americans have to decide whether they will honor their Constitution or international laws against criticizing Muslims.
“Is the First Amendment going to stay inviolable, or are we going to submit to the authority of a macro global-level organization like the U.N., and submit our freedom of speech to the resolutions like U.N. 16/18?” Haney asked.
Bremmer reminded readers that Attorney General Loretta Lynch told a meeting of the Muslim Advocates she would aggressively go after anyone who used “anti-Muslim rhetoric” that “edges toward violence.”
He also spoke to Adina Kutnicki, co-author of “Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad”:
Adina Kutnicki, an Israel-based intelligence analyst and author of “Banned: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad,” noted that particular Lynch speech was given at a conference sponsored by the Muslim Advocates, a Muslim Brotherhood front group.
Kutnicki told WND Dave Gaubatz, a premier counterterror investigator, infiltrated a May 2014 conference of the Islamic Society of North America and overheard a Muslim Advocates representative assure the audience that Facebook is essentially in their pockets. In other words, Muslim Advocates and other front groups are working closely with social media sites to shut down accounts of users critical of Islam.
All of this leads Kutnicki to conclude things are taking a turn for the worse in America.
“Conclusively, free speech is no longer a constitutionally protected right,” she told WND. “Concomitantly, it is only a matter of (a short) time before trials begin, and not only against politicians. The above is manifestly clear: all Americans are in the crosshairs of the nation’s totalitarian speech-minders.”
And like Geller, Kutnicki believes the situation could get worse if Hillary Clinton assumes the presidency.
“No doubt, if Hillary Clinton is elected, or if Democrats retake control of the Senate, Americans will no longer be able to utter public criticism against Islam, migrants or related protected groups,” Kutnicki said. “In actuality, Clinton’s reputation precedes her, relative to her absolute nexus to Islamic dictates. Her closer than close relationship to Huma Abedin – a bona fide member of WAMY (World Association of Muslim Youth) and related Islamic terror groups – is a de facto warning sign that Islam will be protected at all costs.
As we reported here, Clinton is on record as saying that Muslims have nothing to do with terrorism. As Secretary of State, she promised Muslim countries the U.S. government would intimidate Americans critical of Islam into silence.
Clinton has also accepted millions of dollars from Muslim countries with horrific human rights records.
There is no doubt that if elected, Hillary would work to enact Sharia blasphemy laws basically stripping Americans of their First Amendment free speech rights.
Bremmer’s entire piece deserves to be read…
Related:
- Historic: Dems nominate most evil person to run for President
- Hillary Clinton: Muslims ‘have nothing whatsoever to do with terrorism’ — Video
- Flashback: Hillary Clinton promised to silence those critical of Islam
- Gaubatz: Hillary victory ‘exactly’ what Muslim Brotherhood, global Islamic movement wants
- Ouch: British political party calls Hillary Clinton ‘Islam’s whore’
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.
And if you’re as concerned about Facebook censorship as we are, go here and order this new book:
