WHEREAS certain postings require this and that backgrounder and related explanatory material and supportive evidence, the fact is that volumes of the aforementioned already exist; that which document the multitude of measures deployed by social media/big tech overlords to stifle any, and all, opposing voices to their far-left, DemocRAT Mafia-aligned marching orders.
TO WIT, consider the following email thread (received today) as an EMERGENCY NOTICE , gifted from one patriot to countless others. Incontestably, it is meant to serve as a full-on clarion call, that is, when even military officers (on their DoD approved internal channel) are silenced! Censored.
INEXORABLY, it is a mega warning on the eve of the most consequential election in U.S. history. But please bear these observations uppermost in mind: the very fact that the self-appointed ‘Masters of the Universe‘ are still at it – even after the most recent Congressional ‘dressing down’, and juxtaposed against their hyper-muscle approach exerted throughout President Trump’s tenure – well, imagine what they will do if, heaven forfend, Biden-Harris/Harris-Biden claim victory! Shiver the west’s timbers…..
ONTO the ominous, highly telling email thread……
|Operations Officer xxxxxxx
||LTGJC ltgjcmilop xxxxxxx
POSTING NOTICE: Google, Facebook, twitter and Yahoo have shut down many sites including MIL-OPS, a US Defense Department approved site that features an unofficial exchange of views among approximately 10,000 military officers. Also their algorithms have embargoed communications such as this one on the basis of keyword screening. Their objective is to restrict the dissemination of information that they oppose. Thus, informed and free information exchange is being stifled. IF YOU RECEIVE MULTIPLE COPIES OF THIS COMMUNICATION IT IS DUE TO THE FACT THAT WE ARE TRYING SEVERAL ROUTES TO CIRCUMVENT THEIR EMBARGO.
This communication discusses a small portion of the Joseph Biden/Hunter Biden/Biden situation. It focuses on several aspects that are definitely known.
1. The earnings, income, money transfers, etc. that Hunter Biden has been alleged to have received are fully documented and fully acknowledged by the Biden campaign. These include:
a. Hunter Biden received a money transfer of one half million dollars from the wife of the former mayor of Moscow, a known participant in sex trafficking. The purposes of this transfer have not been identified.
b. Hunter Biden received a salary of more than $83,000 a month as a member of the board of a Ukrainian energy company. Under oath testimony from two of the officials claim that the purpose of this appointment/payment was to gain access to the Obama/Biden administration. Telephone conversation logs and emails support the allegation that meetings were held between Joe Biden and interested energy board members and that access was granted to them to meet with other members of the Obama/Biden administration. Joe Biden claims publicly that he did not have any such meetings and that he never discussed any of Hunter Biden’s dealings with Hunter Biden. The Biden campaign has stated that an examination of the official White House visitor logs do not show any meeting between Joseph Biden and any of the Ukrainian energy executives. The counter is that most White House meetings do not show up on the official visit log and that Joe Biden has never been questioned under oath on the subject while all the other claimed participants have said so under oath. In addition, meetings between these executives and lower level US government officials were documented to have occurred. Further, these meetings were set up at the request of White House and State Department officials.
c. Hunter Biden received a non-collateral loan from Chinese close associates of the Chinese Communist Party. The stated amount of the loan was $10 million. At least $5 million was transferred to Hunter Biden with no provisions for security or for payback.
d. Hunter Biden obtained more than $5 billion for establishing an investment fund that he managed and received fees and commissions on. As part of this investment Hunter Biden financed a company [which was Chinese controlled but appeared to be an American company as far as regulations were concerned] that illegally transferred vital US defense technology to China. All of the Chinese participants were close associates of the Chinese communist government. At least one of the Chinese participants has been identified as a high-ranking member of the Chinese communist intelligence apparatus. [ SEE: FBI conducting criminal investigation into Hunter Biden and associates days ahead of 2020 election: Report by Spencer Neale, Breaking News Reporter. SEE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2zLfBRgeFFo&feature=emb_logo
Interview with former Hunter Biden business partner Tony Bobulinski about his alleged dealings with Hunter and Joe Biden. Bobulinski explained how Biden would personally benefit from a stake in a Chinese business deal. ]
2. Joseph Biden claims that he has no knowledge of Hunter Biden’s arrangements and business dealings.
a. On Joseph Biden’s official trips on Air Force two to serve as the US government point man for certain areas on US foreign policy, Hunter Biden accompanied Joseph Biden on the flight. And while Joseph Biden was meeting with government officials, Hunter Biden was meeting with other government officials and business men with close ties to the government. [Requests have not been responded to on whether Hunter Biden was given US security protection while he was off the aircraft in these foreign countries. [But given the high value of Hunter Biden as a kidnap/ransom object it is highly likely that security accompanied and safeguarded Hunter Biden and that these records exist.]
What has been established is that public accusations had been made concerning Hunter Biden’s alleged improper activities in Ukraine prior to the other visits in question. Thus, on the following trips Joseph Biden would have or should have been aware that the ethics of Hunter Biden’s business activities were under public question. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that either Joseph Biden was aware of the possibilities of improper action and did not check on them… a sign of negligence. Or that Joseph Biden was aware of them but did nothing to control them… a sign of negligence or worse. Or that Joseph Biden approved of them… a sign of conspiracy. Or whether Joseph Biden participated in them… A sign of a conspiracy. Or worse.
b. Joseph Biden has been on the public payroll for more than 47 years. Hence, his earnings are trackable for more than 47 years. ( Add into these the earnings of Jill Biden.) The Biden’s live in several multi-million dollar mansion houses. Their lifestyle appears to be lavish. The media question should be: “where did you get the resources for the lifestyle that you live?”
3. Are there other areas of Biden corruption?
a. Right now the Biden campaign is actively encouraging the Palestinian Authority and other Arab countries to resist the peace deal…. this is not being hidden. Where is the media curiosity? Where is the media morality?
Biden met with then-Guatemalan President Otto Pérez Molina, who did not want to renew CICIG’s charter. The Obama administration had promised a $1 billion aid package to Northern Triangle countries (Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador), but Biden made the aid and upcoming trade agreements contingent upon renewing CICIG’s contract. First cajoling then threatening, Biden finally announced, “The CICIG is staying, period.” Biden used this same tactic in Ukraine, where he bragged about threatening to withhold loan guarantees until the Ukrainian government fired the prosecutor investigating Hunter Biden. Biden also sought Pérez’s help in extending CICIG’s rule to El Salvador and Honduras.
4. Is there a media cover-up?
a. Glen Greenwald is the co-founder of Intrepid, a very left-wing publication. Greenwald is very anti-Trump. Greenwald wrote an article on the Biden situation that was critical of Joseph Biden. The article was suppressed by intrepid. Here is Greenwald’s candid analysis of Intrepid [ and the US media] on the subject of Joseph Biden/Hunter Biden/Biden family:
Repeatedly over the past several months, I’ve brought to attention false claims that were published by The Intercept in articles that were designed to protect Biden and malign Trump. Some have been corrected or quietly deleted, while others were just left standing.
The Intercept is now reduced to blindly citing the evidence-free accusations about foreign adversaries from John Brennan and James Clapper — and, worse, distorting what they said to make it even more favorable to Biden than these agents of disinformation were willing to do — is both deeply sad and embarrassing to me as one of the people on whose name, credibility and reputations the Intercept has been built and around which it continues to encourage readers to donate money to it.
Telling me that I can’t publish a pre-election article about Joe Biden that expresses views that have been ratified by some of the nation’s most accomplished journalists is even more grave. I want to note clearly that this is the first time in fifteen years of my writing about politics that I’ve been censored — i.e., told by others that I can’t publish what I believe or think — and it’s happening less than a week before a presidential election, and this censorship is being imposed by editors who eagerly want the candidate I’m writing about critically to win the election. I’m just stating facts that are indisputably true.. It could be that your intense eagerness for Biden to win — shared by every other TI editor in New York — colors your editorial judgment (just as it’s possible that my view that the Democratic Party is corrupt may be coloring mine. The latest and perhaps most egregious example is an opinion column I wrote this week which, five days before the presidential election, is critical of Joe Biden, the candidate who happens to be vigorously supported by all of the Intercept editors in New York who are imposing the censorship and refusing to publish the article unless I agree to remove all of the sections critical of the candidate they want to win.
Worse, The Intercept editors in New York are demanding I not only accept their censorship of my article at The Intercept, but also refrain from publishing it with any other journalistic outlet, and are using thinly disguised lawyer-crafted threats to coerce me not to do so (proclaiming it would it would be “detrimental” to The Intercept if I published it elsewhere).
Over and out…..