Dem. Sen. Chris Murphy: ‘Survival of our democracy depends’ on censorship by big tech

Responding to news that Facebook and other big tech companies have banned Infowars from their platforms, Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Ct., advocated even more censorship, claiming that the “survival of our democracy depends” on it.

“Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart. These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it,” he said.

Trending: Video: Aging Social Distortion punk rocker attacks Trump supporter during concert

Naturally, this didn’t sit too well with those who support the idea of free speech, something guaranteed by the First Amendment.

Good point — How many pro-Trump sites does Murphy want taken down?

That’s exactly what Murphy is saying.

This, by the way, should come as no surprise, given that Democrats are now circulating plans for a complete government takeover of the Internet, which includes mandatory location and identity verification:

According to Reason:

A leaked memo circulating among Senate Democrats contains a host of bonkers authoritarian proposals for regulating digital platforms, purportedly as a way to get tough on Russian bots and fake news. To save American trust in “our institutions, democracy, free press, and markets,” it suggests, we need unprecedented and undemocratic government intervention into online press and markets, including “comprehensive (GDPR-like) data protection legislation” of the sort enacted in the E.U.

Titled “Potential Policy Proposals for Regulation of Social Media and Technology Firms,” the draft policy paper—penned by Sen. Mark Warner and leaked by an unknown source to Axios—the paper starts out by noting that Russians have long spread disinformation, including when “the Soviets tried to spread ‘fake news’ denigrating Martin Luther King” (here he fails to mention that the Americans in charge at the time did the same). But NOW IT’S DIFFERENT, because technology.

“Today’s tools seem almost built for Russian disinformation techniques,” Warner opines. And the ones to come, he assures us, will be even worse.

“Other proposals include more disclosure requirements for online political speech, more spending to counter supposed cybersecurity threats, more funding for the Federal Trade Commission, a requirement that companies’ algorithms can be audited by the feds (and this data shared with universities and others), and a requirement of ‘interoperability between dominant platforms,'” Reason said.

This is just the beginning, as Adina Kutnicki and I pointed out in our book, “Banned: How Facebook Enables Militant Islamic Jihad.”

Now we have Democrats openly embracing censorship.

Talk about your slippery slope.

It shouldn’t be surprising given that he’s a liberal Democrat.

Related:

If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.  You can also follow us on Twitter at @co_firing_line and be sure to check out our MeWe page here and our new PatrioticSpace group here.

If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon.

 

 

 

 

Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.