Dem. Rep. Clyburn suggests Conyers accusers not credible because they’re white, compares them to child murderer

On Wednesday, Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., compared the women accusing Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., to notorious child killer Susan Smith and suggested they may not be credible because they’re white, Robert Draper, a writer for the New York Times, said in a tweet.

“Also at this morning’s House Democratic caucus: James Clyburn compared Conyers’ accusers to the child murderer Susan Smith, who initially claimed a black man had abducted her kids. Clyburn said, these are all white women who’ve made these charges against Conyers,” he said.

take our poll - story continues below

How have you been greeting people this holiday season?

  • How have you been greeting people this holiday season?  

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Completing this poll grants you access to Conservative Firing Line updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to this site's Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Trending: ‘We The People Will Fund The Wall’: Triple amputee vet starts petition, GoFundMe page to build Trump’s wall

According to Breitbart:

Two separate women accused Rep. Conyers of making unwanted sexual advances towards them.

Conyers admitted last week to reaching a $27,000 settlement with a former congressional staffer in 2015. However, the congressman denied allegations of sexual harassment.

Rep. Clyburn’s office reportedly denied the allegations that Clyburn used the Susan Smith metaphor, while Draper suggests that multiple sources have told him that the South Carolina congressman used the reference on several occasions.

Congressman Cedric Richmond, a member of the Black Caucus, said, “This is not accurate. @Clyburn used the Smith example to illustrate the dangers of convicting people before getting all the facts. Although Smith killed her kids, she blamed an innocent person & a lot of people believed that innocent person was guilty.”

“If the police hadn’t investigated, the wrong person would have gone to jail. This mischaracterization of what @clyburn said is nothing more than members changing the story because they want his leadership position,” Richmond added.

Clyburn responded sharply, claiming the statement by Draper was false.

“This is inaccurate in many regards. That discussion had nothing to with Conyers,” he tweeted.

In response, Draper said in another tweet that “that discussion was specifically & exclusively about Conyers, according to 2 attendees. Who else could you have been referring to when bringing up Susan Smith?”

In another tweet, he added:

Smith, by the way, is a white woman currently imprisoned for drowning her children in 1994.  She initially blamed the murders on a “black man” who did not exist.

A number of people piled on to Clyburn:

Another person responded with a reference to the rule regarding holes:

One person asked:

Good question.

As Twitchy noted, “if Clyburn has some further proof that the story is inaccurate, he might want to produce it.”  And he should do it quickly.

Meanwhile, the Associated Press said that Conyers has no plan to resign from office.

“He’s going to fight these allegations tooth and nail if he has to with evidence, with documentation, witnesses, whatever he has to do,” attorney Arnold Reed told the AP. “And the accusers will have to prove up their case.”

But, the New York Post said, he does not intend to run for re-election in 2018.

Wonder why…


If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.  And be sure to check out our new MeWe page here.

If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon.

And if you’re as concerned about online censorship as we are, go here and order this book (Now available at a nine percent discount.  Only 11 copies left at this price right now…):

Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad
Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad – Source: Author (used with permission)



Join the conversation!

We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse.