Why did the so-called ‘mainstream media’ ignore a mass murder in South Carolina?

It’s an understatement to say that the so-called “mainstream media” have mass murder on the brain. The networks and print dailies have been literally obsessed with the school shootings in Parkland, Fla., last month, at times to the exclusion of other news stories.

Part of the fascination with this tragedy, apart from the obvious — children were the victims — has been the highly publicized, if nebulous, demands for change by survivors of the attack on Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, which in turn has spawned a nationwide adult-approved children’s crusade against guns.

So why have the media neglected to cover the killings of four family members at the hands of a fifth in Charleston County, S.C. on March 10? You would think this was a golden opportunity for gun control zealots to renew their calls for stricter gun laws, especially in light of the fact that one of the victims was again a child, age 15.

Yet apart from coverage by a local station, CBS affiliate WCSC, and a wire dispatch from the Associated Press, the story has gone largely unreported.

NewsBusters’ Tom Blumer has an interesting theory as to why, and that has to do with the fact that the murder weapon was not a gun.

WCSC confirms that all four victims “died from blunt trauma, according to Charleston County Deputy Coroner Kimberly Rhoton.”

Blumer adds:

Many key elements of recent widely-covered “mass killings” are present. The only major difference appears to be the weapon the killer used.

The four dead are more than the two killed at Central Michigan University on March 2 and three killed at a California veterans home on March 9. Both the CMU and California incidents received national attention, including network evening news coverage.

The South Carolina murders were of black family members and no others — as were the CMU murders.

As has so often been the case with those who carry out these crimes, including the CMUCalifornia, and the February 14 Parkland, Florida massacre, “warning signs” about Lovequawn Scott’s potential danger to others were apparently ignored. …

Blumer’s argument is tantalizing. Unfortunately, it’s not likely to be either confirmed or refuted by the mainstream media which, if they were to report the story now, would be hard-pressed to explain why the gruesome murders were off their radar for an entire week.


If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.  And be sure to check out our new MeWe page here.

If you appreciate independent conservative reports like this, please go here and support us on Patreon.

Related Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×