British politician says Wikileaks has nothing to do with Russia
The Democrats and the government are constantly telling us to believe that Russia is behind the Wikileaks releases. They want us to ignore them because after all, “Russia is just trying to interfere in the election” …but is that true? Not according to British Politician Craig Murray.
Remember we told you that Wikileaks could not be silenced by clamping down on Julian Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy? That is true- they exist in several countries, and they only release what they are given. They are a publisher, not hackers. They also have never released anything from the embassy- which makes John Kerry not very smart in demanding that Ecuador silence Assange.
Murray wrote on his website:
Sometimes I quite enjoy my life. If you can’t annoy the arrogant bastards who run the world for the 1%, what point is there in living? Craig Murray
I left Julian after midnight. He is fit, well, sharp and in good spirits. WikiLeaks never reveals or comments upon its sources, but as I published before a fortnight ago, I can tell you with 100% certainty that it is not any Russian state actor or proxy that gave the Democratic National Committee and Podesta material to WikiLeaks. The claim is nonsense. Journalists are also publishing that these were obtained by “hacking” with no evidence that this was the method used to obtain them.
The control of the Democratic party machinery deliberately to unfairly ensure Clinton’s victory over Bernie Sanders is a matter of great public interest. The attempt by the establishment from Obama down to divert attention from this by a completely spurious claim against Russia, repeated without investigation by a servile media, is a disgrace.
The over-close relationship between the probable future President and Wall Street is also very important. WikiLeaks has done a great public service by making this plain.
The attempts by the mainstream media to portray WikiLeaks as supporters of Trump and Putin because they publish some of Clinton’s darker secrets is completely illogical and untrue in fact. The idea we must pretend Clinton is a saint is emetic. [Emetic – causing vomiting]
But the key point is that WikiLeaks is a publisher. It is a vehicle for publishing leaks, and is much more of a vehicle for whistleblowers than for hackers. It does not originate the material. I have often seen comments such as “Why has WikiLeaks not published material on Israel/Putin/Trump?” The answer is that they have not been given any. They publish good, verifiable material that they are given by whistleblowers. They are not protecting Israel, Putin, or Trump. Nobody has given them viable material…
… It is worth noting that WikiLeaks is established in several countries and nothing has ever been published by WikiLeaks from any facility situated in the Ecuadorean Embassy.
All of that begs the question in the releases of the DNC or Podesta or Clinton- what if it’s someone inside our own government who felt compelled to tell their secrets by sending the emails to Wikileaks? Hmmmm…
H/T Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children
- Wikileaks: Hillary Clinton wanted to kill Julian Assange with drone strike — Report
- House Dems accuse Trump camp of collusion with Russians on email hacks, demand FBI probe
- John Kerry Demands Ecuador Silence Assange
- Are Democrats setting us up for post-election martial law, civil unrest?
- Sheila Jackson Lee blames Russians, Wikipedia for leaked emails, gets educated by Wikileaks
If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.
And if you’re as concerned about Facebook censorship as we are, go here and order this new book: