Attorney Lisa Bloom suggests whites don’t deserve civil rights in wake of DOJ announcement

On Tuesday, news broke that the Department of Justice is set to identify and litigate against policies which disadvantage white applicants to colleges and universities.  Naturally, this prompted liberal heads to explode across the country.  One of those who went berserk over the news was attorney Lisa Bloom, the lawyer who represented Kathy Griffin after her offensive stunt with a facsimile of President Trump’s bloody severed head.

“After discriminating against LGBTs, Muslims & immigrants, Trump wants DOJ civil rights lawyers to protect whites,” she said on Twitter.

She wasn’t finished, however.

“Remember that the majority of Trump voters think discrimination against white people is more prevalent than against black folks,” she said in another tweet, adding in a response to herself: “I’m a civil rights lawyer. Every day my team fights real civil rights battles for women, people of color, LGBT folks. Whites? Please.”

She then called the president a white supremacist.

“Trump is exactly the white supremacist he showed himself to be during the campaign. Now our tax dollars will defend white rights. Hideous,” she added.

The implication, of course, is quite clear.  Apparently, Bloom doesn’t think that white people deserve equal protection under the law, and furthermore, thinks that those who do believe whites deserve legal protection are white supremacists.

Others made the same connection on Twitter:

Apparently not…



That’s what it sounds like to us.


It’s not just Clinton’s playbook.  For some time, liberals have put forward the notion that white people aren’t even human beings and shouldn’t be allowed to exist.  Time and time again, we’ve reported the numerous “seminars” and events in which alleged “educators” have railed against the existence of white people.  Some, like this guy, have even advocated the genocide of white people.

So it’s no surprise that liberals — even those who happen to be white — don’t believe that white people deserve equal protection.

Of course, Bloom wasn’t the only liberal triggered by the notion of equal protection under the law.  According to a report at Newsbusters, liberal “news” outlets were aghast at the notion:

On CBS This Morning, co-host Charlie Rose informed viewers: The New York Times says the Justice Department is preparing to take on Affirmative Action in college admissions. It is reportedly planning a project to investigate and sue universities  over policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants.” He added: “The Justice Department declined to provide more details about its plans.”

In the Times article, reporter Charlie Savage warned:

The project is another sign that the civil rights division is taking on a conservative tilt under President Trump and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. It follows other changes in Justice Department policy on voting rights, gay rights and police reforms.

Noting that “The civil rights division has been a recurring culture-war battleground as it passed between Democratic and Republican administrations,” Savage explained:

During the administration of George W. Bush, its overseers violated Civil Service hiring laws, an inspector general found, by filling its career ranks with conservatives who often had scant experience in civil rights law. At the same time, it brought fewer cases alleging systematic discrimination against minorities and more alleging reverse discrimination against whites, like a 2006 lawsuit forcing Southern Illinois University to stop reserving certain fellowship programs for women or members of underrepresented racial groups.

In 2009, the Obama administration vowed to revitalize the agency and hired career officials who brought in many new lawyers with experience working for traditional, liberal-leaning civil-rights organizations.

“Once again the liberal media are implying that a Republican administration is racist because it doesn’t accept left-wing social policies,” Kyle Drennen said.

In fact, it’s the left that’s showing itself to be racist by suggesting that a whole race of people don’t deserve legal protection.

So much for that whole “tolerance” and “diversity” thing they keep screaming about.


If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.

And if you’re as concerned about Facebook censorship as we are, go here and order this book:

Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad
Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad – Source: Author (used with permission)

Joe Newby

A 10-year veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps, Joe ran for a city council position in Riverside, Calif., in 1991 and managed successful campaigns for the Idaho state legislature. Co-author of "Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad," Joe wrote for Examiner.com from 2010 until it closed in 2016 and his work has been published at Newsbusters, Spokane Faith and Values and other sites. He now runs the Conservative Firing Line.

Related Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×