Attempted Kavanaugh Murder: Biden Silent, Dems Block Measure To Protect Justices, Garland Refuses To Enforce Law (Video)

As we and others reported early Wednesday, a liberal terrorist armed with a gun and a knife was arrested.  His intent was to break into the home of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and murder him.

One would think this would prompt our so-called “leaders” to at least follow the law.  But these days, one would be wrong.

His Lying Demented Fraudulence, Dictator-Wannabe Joe “Applesauce Brains” Biden, the despicable potted plant currently occupying the White House, spoke to reporters after news of the attempt broke, but said nothing about it.

Biden sent his press lackeys out to assure the liberal media that he condemns the assassination attempt, but we have yet to see him actually make a statement.

The Gateway Pundit noted:

A search of the White House Briefing Room page where Biden’s official statements are posted shows nothing on the attempt on Kavanaugh’s life as of 1 p.m. EDT–three hours after new broke of the incident. Nothing was posted to the White House or POTUS Twitter accounts.

The only tweet on the POTUS account so far Wednesday is a political attack on Republicans in Congress that was posted at 12:43 p.m., “Congressional Republicans want to raise taxes on working families by $1,500 and put Medicare, Social Security, and Medicaid on the chopping block. I disagree. And I’ll work with anyone to deliver real savings to the American people — not take money out of your pocket.”

As of this writing, there is still nothing on the page about the attempt on Justice Kavanaugh’s life.

But there’s more.

On Wednesday, House Democrats blocked a measure that would provide additional security for Supreme Court justices.

Breitbart noted:

House Democrats on Wednesday stalled a bill that would have provided additional security for Supreme Court Justices on the same day a man was arrested for attempting to murder Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA) made a unanimous consent request on the House floor to bring up S. 4160 for a vote. S. 4160, which passed the Senate by a unanimous vote, would have allocated additional security for the justices’ family members.

Despite McCarthy’s request, Speaker Pelosi and the Democrats failed to comply with McCarthy’s proposal to bring the bill to vote.

McCarthy condemned the House Democrats for their refusal to vote on the bill and noted that their refusal came on the same day a man was arrested for plotting to kill Justice Kavanaugh.

But it gets worse.  Writing at Breitbart, John Nolte tells us that Attorney General Merrick Garland is refusing to enforce the law prohibiting protests intended to influence judges.  The law, 18 U.S. Code § 1507 – Picketing or parading, clearly states:

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

Apparently, the Regime doesn’t give a damn about the law.

Nolte observed:

Now, it is a perfectly valid position to oppose this law, to see it as a violation of the First Amendment, to believe it is unconstitutional. As long as the protests are peaceful, why should We the People be restricted in our protests? It’s also possible that the ban on protesting near courthouses is unconstitutional, but that the ban on protesting near someone’s house in a residential neighborhood is constitutional. The Supreme Court has upheld many restrictions on the time, place, or manner of speech.

What’s more, what is wrong with trying to influence a judge’s ruling?

But that’s not the point here…

The point is that the law is the law is the law, and it is Attorney General Merrick Garland’s sworn duty to uphold federal law, and he is not doing that. Why? Well, does anyone doubt that Garland and the lawless White House that appointed him would like nothing more than to see the endless and demonic slaughter of innocent, unborn children continue?

Garland is pro-abortion. That’s why he’s not enforcing the law. This has nothing to do with principle. If it were pro-life protesters out there, you can bet Garland would have already rounded them up and thrown away the key.

It’s clear that in Biden’s Amerika, “there is one law for people on the left and another for people on the right.”

And of course, protesters were back at Kavanaugh’s home.  So much for the law.

As Cristina Laila noted, “Pelosi and her fellow Democrat lawmakers won’t provide more security for the SCOTUS justices because they encouraged the violent uprising.”

And let’s not forget Chuck Schumer’s role in this:

This is what America has turned into, thanks to Biden and the Democrats.  Instead of a hearing about the January 6 riot, perhaps we should have a hearing about all the violence and bloodshed Democrats have incited over the years.


Turn your back on Big Tech oligarchs and join the New Resistance NOW!  Facebook, Google, and other members of the Silicon Valley Axis of Evil are now doing everything they can to deliberately silence conservative content online, so please be sure to check out our MeWe page here, check us out at ProAmerica Only and follow us at Parler, Social Cross and Gab.  You can also follow us on Truth Social here, Twitter at @co_firing_line, and at the social media site set up by members of Team Trump, GETTR.

While you’re at it, be sure to check out our friends at Whatfinger News, the Internet’s conservative front-page founded by ex-military!And be sure to check out our friends at Trending Views:Trending Views


Joe Newby

A 10-year veteran of the U.S. Marine Corps, Joe ran for a city council position in Riverside, Calif., in 1991 and managed successful campaigns for the Idaho state legislature. Co-author of "Banned: How Facebook enables militant Islamic jihad," Joe wrote for from 2010 until it closed in 2016 and his work has been published at Newsbusters, Spokane Faith and Values and other sites. He now runs the Conservative Firing Line.

Related Articles

Our Privacy Policy has been updated to support the latest regulations.Click to learn more.×