EVERY time that Allah’s Muslim Terrorists get caught with their pants down – so to speak – their whining revs up full throttle. As if on cue, CAIR, the Brotherhood Mafia’s spin machine enters the fray. And this evaluation is not hyperbole nor exaggeration. If only.
AS a matter of record, the list of evidence is such that it is book-worthy and provable. However, for the time being, let’s just cite three recent examples (out of many thousands) of propaganda spin, thus, demonstrating how they operate as a well-oiled machine. Goebbels-like.
Is Biden's Vaccine Mandate Unconstitutional?
NOW, who but the likes of Ahmed, a junior jihadi (whose family roots are from Somalia….go figure), would have the temerity to bring a protruding “wired-up” clock to a (Texas) school science fair – a facsimile of a bomb – only to whine when school officials called the police? Hmm.
LO and behold, not only did the family’s whining begin, CAIR’s Brotherhood propaganda machine was at the ready! In effect, the whole “experiment” was a put-up job by junior jihadi’s Brotherhood linked papa in order to scream: “Islamophobia”! Mind you, even HUSSEIN Obama and Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg ran to his defense, as did other like-minded surrogates. Double hmm.
ALONG the same Brotherhood Mafia terrain, what about their putsch into The Citadel, as an Islamist Muslima “tested” the Academy’s reaction to changing the storied military institution’s dress code, all F/B/O of a hijabi-wearing incoming freshman? Indeed, let’s term it: stealth jihad via “the hijab method of attack”! As always, CAIR was on stand-by, threatening to sue for “discrimination.”
A newly admitted Muslim student is considering legal action to force The Citadel to change its dress code on religious freedom grounds after the public South Carolina military college denied her request to let her wear a religious head scarf.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which is representing the student, is refusing to name her, but said she will not enroll unless the school’s policies on uniformity of dress are changed.
School President Lt. Gen. John Rosa said in a statement on Tuesday that uniformity in appearance is the “cornerstone” of the school’s leadership development model. Conformity of dress is necessary, he said, to teach cadets to sacrifice their sense of self.
BUT never mind. Par for the jihadi course, CAIR soldiered on and affixed target sights on their next submission: Norwich University’s military program, the oldest military college in the US! Yes, as is often the case, they prevailed.
LIMP-WRISTED submissive types. Bastards too.
The first time a female Muslim demanded a religious accommodation for the hijab at the Citadel, the school’s rejection was perfectly in line with regulations. But when it happened AGAIN at another Military college, we smelled a rat. And this time, Norwich University ACCEPTED her request for the hijab.
“NORWICH UNIVERSITY GRANTED THE STUDENT’S REQUEST FOR RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATIONS RESPECTIVE TO THE CORPS OF CADETS UNIFORM AND WILL AMEND THE CORPS OF CADETS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES TO PERMIT HER OBSERVATION OF THE HIJAB. THE STUDENT HAS BEEN ADVISED THAT THE RELIGIOUS HEADGEAR, IN AUTHORIZED COLORS AND FABRICS, MUST BE OF A STYLE AND SIZE THAT CAN BE COMPLETELY COVERED BY STANDARD ISSUE CORPS OF CADETS HEADGEAR AND THAT SHE MAY WEAR NORWICH ISSUED LONG SLEEVE SHIRTS AND PANTS.” NORWICH NOTICE OF RULE CHANGE
Norwich is the oldest military college in America, and Colonel Allen West’s Alma Mater.
ALAS, let’s segue to the incessant screams of ENTRAPMENT from Allah’s soldiers, when caught in the act of militant Islamic jihad inside America.
(Yes, Somalis, once again, top the most wanted terrorists list!)
HOW many times, how many ways, does this site have to highlight the dangerous knock-on effects from the ongoing MASSIVE infiltration and penetration a la Somalis into America, atop the latest “refugee” invasion from Syria and assorted Islamic hell-holes? Countless.
WELL, here we go again. However, this go-around, said ISIS aligned soldiers for Allah – once caught in the act – fell back on, you guessed it: entrapment!
What would it take for you to commit mass murder in the name of Allah?
Would you do it for money? For love? Out of a sense of justice? Out of a sense of religious duty?
Absurd as they may seem, these are serious questions, for as jihad mass-murder plots are being uncovered in the United States more frequently than ever, those are accused of perpetrating them and several Islamic groups are increasingly charging entrapment: that overzealous FBI agents pushed poor innocent Muslims into taking part in a jihad plot that otherwise would never have existed.
And so it is here. The same claim has been made in connection with numerous other jihad cases in the U.S. Yet charges of entrapment are silly for any Muslim caught in a jihad terror plot to try to pursue. For there is every indication that these jihadis were more than willing to do whatever was necessary to enable them to join the Islamic State. If undercover agents approached you and tried to entice you into joining a murderous jihad group, how hard would it be to convince you to do it?
Speaking strictly for myself, I have absolutely no worries of ever being entrapped in this way; there is simply nothing, under any circumstances, that anyone could say to me to convince me to blow anyone up or behead anyone. And so if someone showed up and started trying to cajole me into doing so, I would find him irritating, but I wouldn’t even come close to doing anything that would enable anyone to portray me as guilty of anything. Law enforcement agents were not to blame and cannot justly be held accountable for these men’s choices.
These increasingly common charges of entrapment should be seen for what they are: yet another attempt to divert attention from the ugly reality of Islamic jihad activity in the U.S. and around the world, and to place the responsibility for jihadist misdeeds upon non-Muslims — specifically the ones who are trying to thwart the jihadists” plans. After 9/11, we were assured again and again that the vast majority of Muslims in the U.S. and worldwide were peaceful, and sincerely condemned such violence perpetrated in the name of their religion. Yet nearly fifteen years later, we still have yet to see a sincere and effective effort within mosques to expose and report those who hold to the beliefs that led to those attacks.
Instead, we get more finger-pointing and claims of victimhood, even from self-proclaimed moderate Muslims. And that means we will also get more jihad.
“Somali Americans divided as FBI informant testifies against friends,” by Oliver Laughland,Guardian, May 27, 2016:
Abdirahman Bashir sat alone on the stand and began to cry. His head slumped in his hands, his eyes darting between the floor and the ceiling, he avoided the gaze of the three defendants in court. Young men he had allegedly planned to die with. Men whom he ultimately betrayed.
Bashir, a 20-year-old Somali American, had once pledged allegiance to the Islamic State militant group after consuming hours of violent propaganda videos. He listened to lectures delivered by radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki and saw his four cousins depart for the frontlines in Syria. He had planned to follow.
But in December 2014, as the net began to close around him and his alleged co-conspirators, after a reported first attempt to leave the United States failed and news arrived of his cousins’ death following an airstrike, Bashir was looking for a way out.
He agreed to become an informant for the FBI.
Bashir spent the following months recording his friends with a hidden microphone as they plotted to leave Minneapolis for Syria. He taped them at their homes, inside mosques, at shopping malls and during car rides, as they articulated their radicalized views and plans to exit the US.
The recordings form the backbone of the prosecution’s case against 10 indicted Somali Americans from Minneapolis, who formed an alleged Isis cell in the city. These men, all in their early 20s, are facing charges of conspiracy to commit murder outside of the US and providing material support for a terrorist organization. Bashir’s evidence, delivered over five days in court, provides a detailed window into the ways these young men were radicalized and how the terrorist group is attempting to recruit fighters from the west.
His appearance in court has also sharply divided the large, overwhelmingly impoverished Somali diaspora in Minneapolis, which is still reeling from a swathe of young men who left the city between 2007 and 2011 to join the terrorist group al-Shabaab and fight in Somalia. Some accuse Bashir and the FBI of entrapment, saying the tactics have further intensified the mistrust between some members of the community and law enforcement.
MOST significantly, this site’s readers must internalize several understandings, henceforth, coined “Adina Kutnicki’s Bottom Line caveats” :
- Patriots, replace Somalia with any other Islamic hotbed and the end result is the same: militant Islamic terror.
- Replace ISIS aligned with any other jihadi named hydra – Sunni or Shia – and the murder of as many Americans (Israelis and westerners alike) is their goal.
- Whereas some are recent “refugees”, others have been in America for years. But varying time-frames mean less than squat to countless whose allegiance lies under the banner and sword of Allah.
- Whereas some choose to hone their fighting skills outside America (eventually, putting their battle-hardened skill-sets to use upon arrival home, by operating alongside this and that terror group in various Mid East and African theaters), others stay put and plot on American soil.
REGARDLESS of all else, any so-called American leader who stands behind the entry of Muslim “refugees” – from whichever Islamic cesspool – must be cast aside by those who call themselves patriots.
EVEN more so, the clearest message is always one which leaves no ifs, ands or buts. In order words, no pussyfooting around.
IN this regard, ask your leadership a basic two-part question: are they upholding their sworn duties, if they allow those whose allegiance is wedded to Shariah Law and not to the Constitution to enter the country? Btw, this investigative journalist is duly aware that the citizenship oath has been bastardized by Obama Inc. to get around this “sticky” situation.
NEVERTHELESS, inquire: are they aware that (mostly) every terror attack within America has been upheld under the banner and sword of Allah, as exemplified by accompanying shrieks of Allahu Akbar?
YES, creeping Shariah!
BTW, don’t be shocked if some claim the above queries smack of entrapment!
- RAPE-JIHAD EXPLODES: Judges/Police BLAME Victims! Americans, Watch Out.
- The Citadel and The Muslim Female – Should she be allowed to wear the hijab?
- Norwich University Caves to Muslims
- Jihad in America? ‘ISIS here’ sign spotted in report on Ferguson protest
- Pundit for MSNBC, CNN, arrested after vandalizing anti-jihad poster in New York