Liberal response to Oregon ‘standoff’ reveals desire for unrest, violence and bloodshed

Liberal response to Oregon ‘standoff’ reveals desire for unrest, violence and bloodshed

cannon3In February 2011, I first said that liberalism, at its core, is an ideology of rage and hate.  Liberals have proven that assertion correct just about every single day since then, and their reaction to the situation in Oregon is no different.  In fact, their reaction — especially on Twitter — reveals a very disturbing desire for unrest, violence and bloodshed.

As I noted earlier Monday, Montel Williams said the National Guard should be given orders to kill the militia members occupying an empty federal building at a wildlife refuge in Oregon.

He is by means alone.

Here’s just a few tweets to give you an idea of the level of hatred on the left.

Those tweets came from Mike Dickinson, the Virginia liberal who once said he was okay with exterminating the five million members of the NRA.

On Sunday, I wrote about a tweet issued by New York Magazine writer Jonathan Chait, who said he’d vote to kill the militia members involved.  Chait walked that tweet back, but some of the comments were quite revealing, such as this one:


That says pretty much all you need to know about the modern left.  But it continues:

Of course, many say the only reason the militia in Oregon hasn’t been shot yet is because of their skin color.

And yes, in case you’re wondering, the above tweet is from none other than Media Matters sock-puppet Oliver Willis…

Perhaps the real reason law enforcement hasn’t used deadly force yet is out of fear that doing so would simply make things a whole lot worse, as Mike Adams said at Natural News:

Reports that federal officials are headed to Oregon to try to “resolve” the situation where armed citizens now occupy a federal wildlife refuge building should raise warning flags for everyone. If the arrogant, tone deaf federal government attempts an aggressive assault on the compound that results in bloodshed, it might very easily spark a nationwide armed revolt against government tyranny in response.

“After all,” he added, “the nation is already on the verge of revolt as we’ve now seen with the outright rejection of both Democratic and Republican political establishments and the rise of presidential populist Donald Trump.”

He continued:

Tensions are running high across the board. More people than ever are now at the end of their ropes on issues like personal bankruptcy, loss of health care coverage under the Obamacare scam, loss of wages due to job cuts and the fear that comes from living with ISIS terrorists already inside U.S. borders thanks to an incompetent, race-baiting president who apparently seeks the deliberate destruction of America.

And it doesn’t help when local law enforcement paints a picture that simply isn’t true, as Tim Brown notes:

The issue is one of law. The issue is the Constitution. And these men have engaged in the very rights, protected under the First Amendment of assembly and addressing government for redress of grievances.

“These men came to Harney County claiming to be part of militia groups supporting local ranchers, when in reality these men had alternative motives, to attempt to overthrow the county and federal government in hopes to spark a movement across the United States,” Ward said in a statement Sunday.

Contrary to what Harney County Sheriff David M. Ward said, neither the Bundys nor the other patriots that protested or are occupying a public building on land which is unconstitutionally claimed as federal land, are trying to “overthrow the county or federal government.” Since Sheriff Ward doesn’t know the Constitution from the roll of toilet paper in his office, the fact of the matter is that the people are the government in America, which is why the Constitution begins with, “We the People,” and the people are under the Law of God. Separate that out from the fact that the Constitution is for those the people elect to represent them. The Constitution is to be the boundaries of where those representatives have been given authority.

Now we have the very same liberals who stood with the Ferguson and Baltimore rioters (some of whom, by the way, advocated a Communist revolution) calling for bloodshed — again.  Could it be that deep down, liberals really do want a second, bloody civil war in America?

Keep in mind that a lot of conservatives don’t like what they’re seeing in Oregon, but they’re not calling for bloodshed.  Liberals, however…


If you haven’t checked out and liked our Facebook page, please go here and do so.

Trending Now on Conservative Firing Line!