Did Obama Allow the Attacks?

Did Obama Allow the Attacks?

With all the varied opinions on the recent attacks in Egypt and Libya, one I have not heard yet is that Obama knowingly allowed them to materialize, in order to use the moment to raise his chances for reelection.  Absurd?  Possibly.  A conspiracy theory?  Perhaps.  Logical?  Hardly.  Possible?  You bet your bottom dollar.  Let’s begin to piece the puzzle together and see what the picture reveals.

Our story begins in October of 2008.  Joe Biden predicted that Obama would face a world crises within 6 months of taking office.  He said that the world would test Obama, just like they did JFK.  Biden goes on to say that when it happens, Obama would need the American people to stand behind him and support him as this brilliant 47 year old took the crises head on.  It didn’t happen.  But many of you may remember that supporters of Obama bemoaned the fact that Obama did not have a defining 9/11 like disaster, to prove his mettle.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/1008/Biden_Obama_will_be_tested.html

Fast forward to December 2010 and a story by Obama stalwart, Mark Halperin in Time Magazine.  This was written right after the 2010 elections that proved disastrous for Obama and the democrats.  Halperin points out that the Obama coalition was falling apart and that he needed a major event in order to be reelected.

“No one wants the country to suffer another catastrophe. But when a struggling  Bill Clinton was faced with the Oklahoma City bombing and a floundering George  W. Bush was confronted by 9/11, they found their voices and a route to political  revival. Perhaps Obama’s crucible can be positive — the capture of Osama bin  Laden, the fall of the Iranian regime, a dramatic technological innovation that  revitalizes American manufacturing — something to reintroduce him to the  American people and show the strengths he demonstrated as a presidential  candidate. ” Read more: http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2035270,00.html#ixzz26f9EMWi0

Next, we come to the killing of Osama Bin Laden.    It provided Obama with a very temporary bump at best.  There were several reasons for that.  Number one was the revelation that Obama had known where OBL was for nine months and three previous raids had been cancelled at the behest of Valerie Jarrett.    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kCswZUO7_8                                                  http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/29/obama-canceled-bin-laden-kill-raid-three-times-valerie-jarrett/      Now suppose that was done to make the killing closer to the 2012 elections.  Politically, it made sense.  Perhaps they would have postponed it even more but were afraid Bin Laden would leave.  Why else delay the operation.    The other reason it didn’t resonate with people the way they hoped, was Obama’s ego.  He tried to hog the credit from Seals Team Six and people didn’t approve of that.

Then the Obama campaign spent over 100 million in an effort to smear Mitt Romney to no avail.  Desperation was surely setting in at this point.  The republicans war on women was a total bust and amnesty for illegals didn’t win Obama many fans. The GM bailout to prosperity was seen as the joke it was.   He needed something to give him an edge.

Then according to credible sources, Obama became aware of plots in Egypt and Libya, planned for September 11th.  This warning was received anywhere from 48 hours to 7 days prior to the attacks.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/report-state-dept-had-credible-information-48-hours-prior-to-libya-consulate-attack-but-failed-to-act/

http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/15/world/meast/libya-diplomats-warning/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/09/12/Report-Egyptian-Intelligence-Anticipated-Attacks-on-US-Embassy-as-Early-as-Sept-4

Why the disparity?  Because each source could only say when they informed the White House.  Even if we take the shortest time frame of 48 hours, the question becomes, why did we not move our people out of the country?  Why did we not reinforce our embassies with marines.  Why did we not have marines guarding the embassies.  The White House story is that they were never warned.  A premise that is ridiculous on the face of it.  If they had no warning, why did they move Ambassador Stevens?  And because of Sean Smith posts on his Eve gaming site, we know embassy employees watched as the Libyan guards snapped pictures of the buildings and grounds of the embassy.  Do you suppose no one thought to contact Hillary or Obama?  Not likely.

http://riehlworldview.com/2012/09/murdered-foreign-service-officer-sean-smith-assuming-we-dont-die-tonight-we-saw-one-of-our-police-that-guard-the-compound-taking-pictures.html

And there were no marines guarding the life of Ambassador Stevens.  Why?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2202409/Safe-house-Ambassador-died-Marine-guard-body-missing-hours-Full-scale-chaos-surrounding-Libyan-killings-revealed.html

Can I say without a doubt that Obama allowed this tragedy to happen?  No, I certainly can’t.  On the other hand, can you deny that it’s possible based on the lies the White House has spread?  No, you can’t.  Obama counted on keeping the relevant facts out of the media, aided by his corrupt press.  That much is certain.

Trending Now on Conservative Firing Line!